Page:IJAL vol 1.djvu/289

 NO. 4

��THE HOKAN AND COAHUILTECAN LANGUAGES

��28l

��orthographies have been preserved, except that Swanton's I (i of English //), e (e of English niei), and a (it of English but} have been respec- tively changed to t, E and a ; Kroeber's and Bar- rett's G', g' (voiced velar spirant) have been changed to y.

The vocabularies have been derived from the following sources :

1 . Chontal material obtained from vocabu- lary quoted in A. L. Kroeber, Serian, Tequis- tlatecan, and Hokan. A few forms I owe to ma- nuscript material loaned by Dr. P. Radin.

2. Seri material obtained from vocabularies quoted in J. N. B. Hewitt, Comparative Lexi- cology, pp. 299-344 of W J McGee, The Sen Indians, ijth Annual Report Bureau of Ameri- can Ethnology, part I, 1898.

3. Yuman dialects quoted are : Diegueiio (Dieg.), Mohave (Moh.), Tonto, Kutchan (or Yuma), Cocopa (Coc.), Tulkepaya (Tul.), Santa Catalina (de los Yumas) (S. Cat.), H'taa'm, Maricopa (Mar.), Walapai (Wai.), Kiliwi, and Cochimi. Most of this material is taken from Yuman vocabularies quoted in J. N. B. Hewitt, ibid. ; and in Albert S. Gatschet, Der Yuma-Sprachstamin nacb d(n neuesten hand- schriftlichen Qnellen dargestelll, Zeitschrift fur Ethnologic, vol. 9, pp. 365-418, 1877. (K) after Mohave and Diegueno forms indicates that they are quoted from A. L. Kroeber, Phonetic Ele- ments of the Mohave Language, University ot California Publications in American Archaeo- logy and Ethnology, vol. 10, n 3, pp. 45-96, 1911 ; and A. L. Kroeber and J. P. Harrington, Phonetic Elements of the Diegueno Language, ibid., vol. n, n 2, pp. 177-188, 1914.

4. Esselen material obtained from A. L. Kroeber, Esselen, pp. 49-68 of The Languages of the Coast of California south of San Francisco, ibid., vol. 2, n 2.

5 . Seven dialects of Pomo are recognized by Barrett : Northern (N.), Central (C.), Southern (S.), Southwestern (S. W.), Southeastern (S. E.), Eastern (E.), and Northeastern (N. E.). All forms whose dialect is expressly given are from S. A. Barrett, vocabularies given (pp. 56-58) in The Ethno-geography of the Pomo and neighboring Indians, ibid., vol. 6, n i, 1908. Pomo forms not specified as to dialect are from Kroeber's Eastern Pomo material in The Languages of the Coast of California north of San Francisco, vol. 9, n 3, 1911, pp. 320-347.

6. Yana material obtained from my own manuscripts.. Central Yana forms are given except where S. indicates that Southern Yana (Yahi)is meant.

7. Chimnriko material obtained from R. B. Dixon, The Chimariko Indians and Language, ibid., vol. 5, n 5, pp. 293-380, 1910.

8. Karok material obtained from A. L. Kroe- ber, Karok sketch (pp. 427-435) in The Lan- guages of the Coast of California north of San Francisco. Further material obtained from Mr. E. W. Gifford's Karok manuscripts is indicated (G).

9. Shastan consists principally of three lan- guages : Shasta (S.), Achomawi or Pit River (Ach.), and Atsuge\\i or Hat Creek (Ats.). Forms given are obtained from R. B. Dixon, The Shasta- Achonia'iL'i : a new Linguistic Stock, u'ilh four new Dialects, American Anthropolo- gist, N. S., vol. 7, pp. 213-217, 1905 ; also his comparative Chimariko-Shastan table given on PP- 337 an d 338 of The Chimariko Indians and Language. A few Achomawi words marked (S) are taken from a manuscript vocabulary I ob- tained in 1907 while engaged in Yana work for the University of California. Certain Achomawi and Shasta forms were also obtained from Mr. E. W. Gifford's manuscripts; they are indicated (G.).

10. All undesignated Tonkawa words and

�� �