Page:History of Woman Suffrage Volume 6.djvu/527

 OHIO 511 It advertised everywhere, by posters and in street cars, and had no voluntary workers. It was evident that huge sums were being spent. The amendment was lost by a majority of 87,455 ayes, 249,420; noes, 336,875. Only 24 out of 88 counties were carried and but one Congressional district, the Eighteenth. There was never any state-wide anti-suffrage association of women but only small groups in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Dayton and Columbus. Most of them were rich, well situated, not familiar with organized reform work and not knowing the viciousness of their associates. The real foe was the associated liquor men, calling themselves at first the Personal Liberty League, later the Home Rule Association, appearing under differ- ent names in different campaigns and they had in their employ a few women who were connected with the Anti-Suffrage Association. The amendment was lost in 1912 because of the activity of the liquor interests and the indifference of the so-called good people. More men voted on this question, pro and con, than had ever voted on woman suffrage before in any State., The amendment eliminating the word "white," left over from ante bellum days, also was defeated and the new constitution retained a clause which had been nullified by the 15th Amend- ment to the National Constitution forty years before! The initia- and referendum amendment was carried. The State Suffrage Association, therefore, early in 1913, decided to circulate a petition initiating a woman suffrage amendment to the constitu- tion, as there was no hope that the Legislature would submit one. It required the signatures of ten per cent, of the voters at the last election, in this instance 130,000 names. It was drawn by an Ohio member of Congress, received at State- headquarters April submitted to the Attorney General and held many weeks. When returned, instructions were carefully followed. n Scptcm 15 the first petition heads erc received from the prim It was a new law and lawyers and laymen were uncertain about it. The question of the validity of the petitions if circulated by women was raised and a ruling was asked for. The Secretary of decided that women could circulate them and the Attorney General agreed. It was feared by some that the petition head w*B faulty because it did not contain a repeal clause and after three