Page:History of Greece Vol XI.djvu/165

 MISERY OF riMOLKOX. 139 Plutarch tells us hardly anything except what personally concerns Timoleon. We learn however that the expressions of joy among the citizens, at the death of Timophanes and the restoration of the constitution, were vehement and universal. So strongly did this tide of sentiment run, as to carry along with it, in appearance, even those who really regretted the departed despotism. Afraid to say what they really felt about the deed, these men gave only the more abundant utterance to their hatred of the doer. Though it was good that Timophanes should be killed (they said), yet that he should be killed by his brother, and his brother-in-law, was a deed which tainted both the actors with inexpiable guilt and abom- ination. The majority of the Corinthian public, however, as well as the most distinguished citizens, took a view completely oppo- site. They expressed the warmest admiration as well for the doer as for the deed. They extolled the combination of warm family affection with devoted magnanimity and patriotism, each in its right place and properly balanced, which marked the conduct of Timoleon. He had displayed his fraternal affection by encoun- tering the greatest perils in the battle, in order to preserve the life of Timophanes. But when that brother, instead of an inno- cent citizen, became the worst enemy of Corinth, Timoleon had then obeyed the imperative call of patriotism, to the disregard not less of his own comfort and interest than of fraternal affection. 1 Such was the decided verdict pronounced by the majority a majority as well in value as in number respecting the behavior of Timoleon. In his mind, however, the general strain of encomium Tas not sufficient to drown, or even to compensate, the language of i-eproach, in itself so much more pugent, which emanated frcoi tho minority. Among that minority too was found one person whose single voice told with profound impression his mother Dema- riste, mother also of the slain Timophanes. Demariste not only thought of her murdered son with the kneenest maternal sorrow, but felt intense horror and execration for the authors of the deed. She imprecated curses on the head of Timoleon, refused even to see him again, and shut her doors against his visits, in spite of earnest supplications. There wanted nothing more to render Timoleon thoroughly 1 Plutarch, Tiraoleon, c. 5.