Page:Harvard Law Review Volume 10.djvu/48

22 22 HARVARD LAW REVIEW. as a restrictive covenant with respect to the exercise of the fran- chise and upon the use of the articles, it would confer rights which a court of equity could protect, and one who had notice of these rights would not be permitted to use his legal title for the purpose of defeating them. Proof of the notice must be distinct. Notice "must be brought home to the purchaser," but if there were definite notice of the contract, and certainly if there were evidence of intentional combination with the person by whom it was made, it may be assumed that the court of equity would give redress. Edward Quinton Keasbey. Newark, N. J., March, 1896.