Page:HKSAR v. Wun Shu Fai (CACC 48-2015).djvu/17

Rh applicant’s case, he had read the 12 letters from Billy Kay to various police officers dated on and between 9 January 2010 and 30 October 2013. Similarly, he had read the extracts of the Police Investigation Reports. He said that he had never received nor read the affirmation of Jacky Ma, dated 9 August 2012, which was filed with the Court in support of his application for leave to appeal against sentence, nor had he received or read the police notebook entries related to the visit of police officers to Jacky Ma and Billy Kay exhibited to Mr Cheung’s affidavit.

33. Chief Inspector Chan said of the contents of the letters written by Billy Kay to the police officers that they expressed “…his personal feelings and/or concerns of his welfare in prison without mentioning D (the applicant).” Of the fact that none of the letters were in the List or Bundles of unused material served in advance of the committal of the applicant, Chief Inspector Chan said “…since these letters are not relevant or possibly relevant to any issue in the case against D, items (2)-(13) were not included”. He said that he reached a similar conclusion in respect of the Police Investigation Reports.

34. Senior Inspector Lee Ming Kong said that from 5 October 2014 onwards he was the officer-in-charge of the team in the Organized Crime and Triad Bureau responsible for the applicant’s case. He said that he had read the same 12 letters written by Billy Kay to various police officers. On 26 January 2015, after the conclusion of the applicant’s trial, he had received an undated letter from Billy Kay. He said that he had read the extracts of the Police Investigation Reports.