Page:HKSAR v. Tong Ying Kit (Verdict).pdf/61

-61- : the words was capable of inciting others to commit secession;
 * (2) at the material time, the Defendant himself understood the Slogan to carry a secessionist meaning, that is, separating the HKSAR from the PRC;
 * (3) when the Defendant displayed the Slogan in the manner he did, he intended to communicate the secessionist meaning of the Slogan to others and he intended to incite others to commit secession by separating the HKSAR from the PRC;
 * (4) the Slogan is a political agenda advocated by the Defendant at the time;
 * (5) the Defendant’s failure to stop at all the police checklines, eventually crashing into the police, was a deliberate challenge mounted against the police, a symbol of Hong Kong’s law and order;
 * (6) the Defendant’s acts were acts involving serious violence against persons and/or were dangerous activities which seriously jeopardised public safety or security;
 * (7) the Defendant’s acts had caused grave harm to the society; and
 * (8) the Defendant carried out those acts with a view to intimidating the public in order to pursue political agenda.