Page:Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar (1910 Kautzsch-Cowley edition).djvu/515

  );  (prop. he restrains not) unceasingly, ;   and   (without tottering) immovably; cf. also,.

Clauses which depend on a transitive verb, especially on what are called, i.e. verbs denoting any mental act, such as to see, to hear, to know, to perceive, to believe, to remember, to forget, to say, to think, &c., may be subordinated to the governing verb without the help of a conjunction by simple juxtaposition , or they may be co-ordinated with it either with or without (–h). As a rule, however, the objective clause is introduced by the conjunction, less frequently by.

Examples:—

(a) Object-clauses without a conjunction. Besides the passages mentioned in § 120 (especially under e) there are a number of examples, in which a clause depending on a or sentiendi (the oratio obliqua of the Latin and English Grammar) is added in the form of an independent noun-clause or verbal-clause; e.g.   art my sister;, a.14, ;  (after );  (after ); verbal-clauses, e.g.  thou thoughtest  [but read  for ]; ,  what ye have seen me do; ,.

(b) Object-clauses introduced by, e.g. , &c.—Direct narration also is very frequently introduced by  (analogous to the ὅτι recitativum; frequently, indeed, with the secondary idea of a particle of asseveration, as in , ), e.g. ,  f., 26:22, 29:32, 37:35, , &c., even when the direct narration is not expressly indicated, , ,  f., .—On the expression of a second object by means of a clause introduced by , see.

(c) Object-clauses introduced by, e.g. ; , , , even before direct narration, ,. Somewhat frequently is preceded by