Page:Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar (1910 Kautzsch-Cowley edition).djvu/412

 Other examples are: after Niph.,  (cf., and after an infinitive, ); ,  (after an infinitive); 29:27 (unless  is 1st plur. cohortative); , , ,  (after an infinitive); 26:55 (cf. verse 53);  (where, however, for  the Hiph.  should be read, according to 1:28); , ; with the object preceding, , , , , Dan 9:24. — Also after Puʿal, ; before Puʿal, ( equivalent to the internal object =which they have caused to be served by thee); ; according to the Masoretic text also, where, however, the Samaritan and LXX read  for ; the Samaritan in  and 46:27 also reads , and this (or ) should certainly be read instead of  in .—After Hoph., , , , , , , , ; after the infinitive Hoph., ,  f., 27:7; before Hoph., , , , ; after the infinitive Hothpaʿel,  f.

2. Verbs which in the active take two accusatives retain in the passive construction at least one accusative, namely that of the second or remoter object, whilst the nearer object now becomes the subject. Thus, corresponding to  the passive is   which thou hast been shown, i.e. which has been shown to thee; cf. (but in with an accusative of the person);. In  depends on an assumed transitive  governing two accusatives (= my tongue is made to cleave to my jaws); also in, ,  is not an ''accus. instrumenti'', but most probably an accusative of the object retained from the active construction.

Rem. 1. Examples of the retention of the second accusative are—(a) with and exuendi, ,  (the vine);. So also some of the examples in of passive participles of these verbs,, , , ,