Page:Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar (1910 Kautzsch-Cowley edition).djvu/237

 others (cf. Nöldeke,  xxx. 185),  from, not Pi‛lel of  = ; hence, according to ,  (for ) , ; but in , where Baer requires , read  with ed. Mant., Ginsb.

8. The apocope of the causes no further changes beyond the rejection of the, e.g.  from ; in one verb middle guttural, however, a form occurs with the  shortened to , viz. (for ), as in verbs ; but in  verse 14. Cf. bb.—The  emphasizing an, , is very extraordinary; probably it is a subsequent correction of an erroneous repetition of .—The ''infin. constr.'' occurs in,  for ; cf. above, n.—On the with the  elided, see .—The irregular   has probably arisen from a combination of the readings   and. Similarly the solecism  might be due to a combination of the participle fem. Niphʿal (, cf., , ) with the  ; but it is more correct, with Wellhausen, to explain the  from a confusion with  and to read, in fact,.

III. On Piʿēl, Pôʿēl, Puʿal, and Hithpaʿēl.

9. In the 1st and 2nd persons of the the second syllable in most of the instances has  on the analogy of  (see f), as, ; always so in the first plur., and before suffixes, e.g.  ,. The form with is found only in the 1st sing. (e.g. ;,  along with the form with î). On the tone of the ''perf. consec. Pi‛el'' of, see .— has (besides ) as a rule. On the other hand, always has, e.g.  .—A 1st ''sing. perfect Pô‛ēl'' ( =) occurs in.

10. The infinitive absolute Piʿēl takes the form, (like , the more frequent form even in the strong verb, see ); with ô only in  ; with ôth   (cf. above, n). On and, infinitives absolute of the passive of , not of Pô‛ēl, see above, n.—As   occurs in ,  (only orthographically different from , if the text is correct);   (on the  see rr);  , , for which in ,   with ''infin. abs.''; in.

11. The apocopated must (according to ) lose the  of the second radical, hence,  (for =te‛arrè) ; cf. ; even in the principal pause ; , ;  ; cf. . With the lengthening of to, ,  (but read with Thenius , and instead of the meaningless  ibid. read ). In, in close connexion, ;  ; according to Qimḥi also ,  , , , , whilst Baer and Ginsburg read with the best authorities ,  (but cf. König, Lehrgeböude, i. 597). —On  (for ) cf. ; on, see ;