Page:Finch Group report.pdf/123

 {| style="border: 1px solid darkgray" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0"
 * - valign="top"
 * width="90" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" |
 * width="100" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | More UK publications freely available globally Repositories
 * width="100" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | More global publications accessible in UK HE
 * width="100" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | More global publications accessible to non-HE
 * width="100" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Financial health of publishers and learned societies
 * width="100" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Costs to HE
 * width="100" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Costs to research funders
 * width="100" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Sustain high-quality research
 * width="100" style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Sustained or enhanced services to readers
 * - valign="top"
 * style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Repositories
 * style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Significant improvement in access outside HE and large corporate sectors (but not necessarily to version of record with full functionality) through enforcement of funder and university mandates. Embargos on access may encourage publishers to support and facilitate deposit, but diminish utility for readers. Improvements in access to UK-authored grey literature.
 * style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Only if there is a global movement towards mandates and their enforcement. Embargos and restrictions on access to the version of record, with full functionality, diminish utility for readers.
 * style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Significant improvement in access to UK publications through enforcement of mandates; global publications only if mandates introduced and enforced overseas. Improvements needed to navigation and discoverability. Embargos and restrictions on access to the version of record, with full functionality, diminish utility for readers.
 * style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Risk to publishers and learned societies from subscription cancellations. Risks diminished through enforcement and length of embargos and restrictions on access to the version of record with full functionality.
 * Costs to individual institutions of sustaining repositories (costs of setting them up largely sunk, but need for continuing development). Sector costs (through JISC and others) of developing and sustaining UK infrastructure for navigation, preservation etc
 * style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | JISC costs for infrastructure for navigation, preservation etc.
 * style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Risks (if publishers lose revenue) to the service that publishers provide to authors, including peer review and accessibility of different routes to publication. Hence risks to standing of UK research base. Increased access to high-quality research reports offset to some extent by risks in mixing up content that has and has not been subject to peer review.
 * style="border: 1px solid darkgray" | Access not necessarily to version of record. Risk (if publishers lose revenue) to discovery and navigation systems they currently sustain. Need for innovation in development of the discovery, navigation and preservation infrastructure for different kinds of content.
 * }