Page:Federal Reporter, 1st Series, Volume 9.djvu/910

 DNITBD STATES i;. TTYNN. 895 �opinion, makes it clear that tHe offence charged is not infamous within the rules herein stated. The fact that imprisonment "at hard labor" is denounced does not make the offence infamons within the purview of the constitution, and consequently the case was rightly tried on information. �The motion in arrest is overruled. �' "The cases cited and examined are appended: �Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 591 ; U. 8. v. Reid, 12 How. 364; 1 Keit, Comm. 1 Chit. Crim. Law, *600, *601, p. 599; Phil. Ev. 23, note; PeopZe v. WA«p- ple, 9 Cow. 707; Clark's Lessees v. Hall, 2 Harris & MeHenry, 378; People Yf Herrick, 13 Johns. 82; Cushman v. Loker, 2 Mass. 106; 1 Stark.;Ev. ,94, 95;.? Haie, 237;,1 Bish. Crim. 'L^^yv, g§ 743, 580, 581, 584,, 621, 974 ; 1 Greenl.'Ev. §§ 372, 373, p. li)\ Pendock v. Mackmder, 2 Wilson, 18; Coke, Eitt. a91a, *eb, note i; 4B1. Coiii. 94,''95, 230; 1 Eussell, Crimes, (Graves* Ed.) 44J 46, 47; Rexv. Ptiddle, LeacK 442; 2 Haie, P. G. 277; EeX v. Davis, 5 Mod.75; 3 Wilson's Works, 371, 377; 1 Haie, P. G. & 43^ p. 503; Willis. 665; State v. Gardner, 1 Root, (Conn.) 485; Corn. v. Keith, 8 Met. (Mass.) 531 ; Lyford. v. Farrar, 11 Poster, (N. H.) 314; .JT. 8. y. M<iopwell,.Z DilL 275, 278; in re Trumati, 44 Mo. 181 ; Fox y. 8tate, 5 How. 410, 438 ; Moore y. State, 14 How.: 13; U. 8. v. 8Tiepard, 1 Abb. 436, 440; U. S.y. Magiil, 1 ■Waahb.-464, 465; U. S. v. Havothorne,! Dill. 422; Stafe v. Keyes, 8 Vf. 66, 65; 5 Watts & Serg. 342; U. S. y: ffudson, 7 Cranch, 84; U. 8: v. Lancaster, 2 McLean, 431, 433; U. 8. v. Wiltherger, 5 Wheat. 76, 93,' 96; U. 8. V. New Bedford Bridge, 1 Wood & M. 401; State y. Stephetison, a Bailey, 33,4; ,)?. 8. v. Wilson, 4, Blatchf. 435; Sergeant's, Coast Law, 345; U. S. y, Coolidge, 1 TVheat. 415; U. 8. v. Bsavons, 3 Wheat. 336; U. 8. y. Burr, 4 Cranch, 500; Marhney v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 176; 4 Tueker's Blackstone, No. 10 of appendix; Conkling's Treatise, 83; V. 8. v. Cross, 1 McArthur, 149; U. 8. v. Coppersmith, 4 FED. Rep. 198; U. 8. v. Sheperd, 1 Hughes. 620; U. 8. v. Block, 4 Sawy. 212; U. 8. v. Yates, 6 Fed. Rep. 861; U. 8. y. Baugh, 1 Ped. Rep. 784; U.8. v. Waller, 1 Sawy. 701; Whart. Crim. Law, (3d Ed.) 354 et seq.; 11 Am. Jur. and other authorities cited; U. 8. v. Okie, 5 Blatchf. 516; U. 8. v. Clark, Crabbe, 584; U. S. v. (?oMm^, 2' Cranch, 212; U. 8. y. Patters&n, 6 McLoan, 467, 468; U. 8. v. Mills, 7 Pet. 138; U. 8. y. Clayton, 2 Dill. 226; Wilson v. State, 1 Wis. 189; Com. y. Barlow, 4 Mass. 439; Com. v. Macomber, S Mass. 257; Stai- Monte Cases, unreported. ��� �
 * 336, 337; Coke, Litt. 6, a 6; Blackstone, *370; Phil. Ev. vol. 1, p. 22, liote;