Page:Federal Reporter, 1st Series, Volume 9.djvu/336

 TORNBTILL V. 87 BLOCKS OF MAEBLE. 321 �questioned that the expense was incurred, and for this purpose. The only question is, upon whommuBt it fall? This is determined by an examination of the terras of the bill of lading, which contains two clauses which have been insisted upon in the argument as having a bearing upon this issue. It is provided that the marble is "to be delivered from the ship's deck, when the ship's responsibility shall eease;" and a f urther proviso that the "landing is to be designated by consignees, provided the steamer can approach safely and •will lay afloat." This last clause has no reference to the manner of delivery of the cargo, as to where it is to be received by the consignees. It merely gives the consignees the right to select the place of landing, and leaves the vital claim of the contract as to delivery unrestrioted and unaffected. �Words cannot have a clearer or more unambiguous meaning than this clause : "To be delivered from the ship's deck, when the ship's responsibility shall cease." There can be no evidence as to custom in such a case. The delivery, and, consequently, the receipt of the goods, was to be from the ship's deck; whatever the appliances were, to be constructed or used, or expenses incurred, to effect the move- ment of the marble after it left the ship's deck, were intended to be at the cost of the consignees; and, as if to place the stipulation be- yond all possible misconstruction, it is added, — i. e., when the cargo leaves the deck,— the ship's responsibility shall cease; for it can hardly be contended that the ship's expenses should continue after its responsibility had, by the terms of the contract, ceased. �This clause was inserted, most likely, on account of the great weight of the parcels or pieces of marble, ^and to place upon the con- signees the duty of ^11 preparations for carrying the marble beyond the wharves — which are structures insufficient to sustain such woight — as well as all cost of making the transfer. �This item is therefore allowed, and the judgment will be for the libellants for the amoant of the first and last items claimed, with costs. �v.9,no.5— 21 ��� �