Page:Federal Reporter, 1st Series, Volume 3.djvu/113

 could not well operate a railroad through a receiver in any other way. The remedy is cheap, speedy, effective, and just. It may, however, be abused—so may any other judicial power—but the protection against abuse, in laws of this kind, is not to be found in an appeal to a jury, but in an appeal to the court of last resort. This remedy is open to the petitioner. If injustice shall be done him here the error will be corrected by the supreme court. The intervention of a jury is not deemed necessary in this case, and the petitioner’s motion for one will be denied.

v.

(Circuit Court, D. Nebraska.———, 1880.)

In Equity. Motion to dissolve injunction.

A. J. Poppleton, for complainant.

J. M. Woolworth and T. M. Marquette, for defendants.

, C. J.This case is before me on a motion to dissolve the injunction heretofore allowed restraining