Page:Enquiry into plants (Volume 1).pdf/422

 THEOPHRASTUS tw

/3tcordra<; elvai

(pvecv etepa^

fir]

aXX' e^ avrcop

ael avvapairXripovcrOat, yeXocov av tcrco^ Sokolt) tolavTT) (Tvy/cpLai^ iav

yap 5

to areXe^of;' avrrj

[Jievrj

tovto

olov viToOeai^; fcai (pvai^ SevSpcop.

fiep

ovv OTTorepQ)^ irore eKreov ovOev av Btevey/cat 7r/909 ra vvv, Ta^a S' av etr] fia/cpo^icoTarov to TrdvTO)^ Svvdfjievov dvTapKetv, &aiTep rj eXda kol Kal

c7T6Xe%efc

tS>

Bv(Tco€0pov<; T?79

76

yLtia?

pi^cov

KaX

7]

oXr]

eTt] Bta/coata,

jUi6po<;

KKrjp^aTd

Ttve^,

6dT€pa

co?

el

5'

oirep iirl tS)v

Trapatpov/jLevcov

tmv

hvvaTai hiajieveiv to crreXe^o?,

^vai^ opioia

oiroaovovv

/cal o/iOLOcpopo^

av

ecr]

TrdvTcov,

(f)aal Be

OTav tjBtj Bokj] KUTa^e peer Bar eTTi^dWeiv fcal fcapTrovaffac tov

iToielv

Te

evtavTov*

tov y^povov,

dvajieTpelv

y^povQV, p^a/cpo^tcoTaTov

Belv ovTO)

tco

SoKel 8e 6 ^lo^

pLi^a<;,

/neTpov

Xeyovau

KaTa

kuI

elvai, KaO^ ov to crreXe^o? Bet ttjv

piaXiGTa nrepX dp^TreXcov

ra?

e')(eiv

TiOevTa

dp'X^rjv

'n-apapXaGTrjcrei

Tjj

p^eTa

Be

TavTa

dpireXov

tt}?

KaTacrKdyfravTa

ireplKaOapai

irdaa^

eirl

Ta<;

pi^a^y cIt epTTXrjaai (f^pvydvcov /cal eirapLrjaaaOaL 6

T7]v

yrjv

a^oBpa,

TovT(p p.ev ovv

Tc3

B

t&

eTei KafC(o<; (pepeiv

v(7Tep(p /SeXTCov,

t&

Be TpLT(p /cal

Aid., 8C. rcau ^i-C^v €/c rwv ahrwv conj. W. such an argument practically assumes the permanence of the trunk, which in the case of the vine can hardly be considered apart from the root. doKoirj rotavrri avyKpiais I ^

€| avTcov

',

^ i.e.

G

conj. from ^iKaLordrr) avyKpiffis MVAld. ; diKaioToirrji crvyKplcTds ^okoltj ejvai rj avyKpicris conj. Sch. ; so in his earlier edition in his later editions he emends wildly.

U

W.



388