Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 9.djvu/678

 642 F K A N E [LITERATURE. Lenient has said, that the closely following Jacquerie is but a practical carrying out of the doctrines of the anonymous satirists of Renart le Contre-fait. Early Lyric Poetry. Side by side with these two forms of literature, the epics and romances of the higher classes, and the fabliau, which, at least in its original, represented rather the feelings of the lower, there grew up a third kind, consisting of purely lyrical poetry. The song literature of mediaeval France is extremely abundant and beautiful. From the 12th to the 15th century it received constant ac cessions, some signed, some anonymous, some purely popu lar in their character, some the work of more learned writers, others again produced by members of the aristo cracy. 7 Of the latter class it may fairly be said that the catalogue of royal and noble authors boasts few if any names superior to those of Thibaut de Champagne, king of Navarre, and Charles d Orle ans, the father of Louis XII. Although much of this lyric poetry is anonymous, the more popular part of it almost entirely so, yet M. Paulin Paris has been able to enumerate some hundreds of French chansonniers between the llth and the 13th century. The earliest song literature, chiefly known in the delightful col lection of ^axt $:Ci.(Alt-Franzosische Romanzen und Pastour- elleri), is mainly sentimental in character. The collector divides it under the two heads of romances and pastourelles, the former being usually the celebration of the loves of a noble knight and maiden, and recounting how Belle Doette or Eglantine or Oriour sat at her windows or in -.the tourney gallery, or embroidering silk and samite in her chamber, with her thoughts on Gerard or Guy or Henry, the latter somewhat monotonous but naive recitals, very often in the first person, of the meeting of an errant knight or minstrel with a shepherdess, and his cavalier but not always success ful wooing. &quot; With these, some of which date from the 12th century, may be contrasted, at the other end of the medi ae vaUperiod, the more varied and popular collection dating in their present form from the 15th century, and published recently by M. Gaston Paris. In both alike, making allow ance for the difference of their age and the state of the language, may be noticed a charming lyrical faculty and great skill in the elaboration of light and suitable metres, skill to which the hitherto usual preference of the Provencal poets as metrists has done but scant justice. Especially remarkable is the abundance of refrains of an admirably melodious kind. It is said that more than 500 of these exist. Among the lyric writers of these four centuries whose Audefroi names are known may be mentioned Audef roi le Bastard, the 1 author of the charming song of Belle Idoine, and others no way inferior, Quesnes de Bethune, the ancestor of Sully, whose song-writing inclines to a satirical cast in many in stances, the Vidame de Chartres, Charles d Anjou, King John of Brienne, &c. But none of them, except perhaps Audefroi, Thibaut can compare with Thibaut IV., who united by his possessions deCham- and ancestry a connexion with the north and the south, and pagne. ^Q employed the methods of both districts but used the language of the north only. Thibaut was supposed to be the lover of Blanche of Castile, the- mother of St Louis, and a great deal of his verse is concerned with his love for her. But while knights and nobles were thus employing lyric poetry in courtly and sentimental verse, lyric forms were being freely employed by others, both of high and low birth, for more general purposes. Blanche and Thibaut themselves came in for contemporary lampoons, and both at this time and in the times immediately following, a cloud of writers composed light verse, sometimes of a lyric sometimes of a narrative kind, and sometimes in a mixture of both. Rutc- By far the most remarkable of these is Rutebrcuf (born in bceuf, 1230), the first of a long series of French poets to whom in recent days the title Bohemian has been applied, who passed their lives between gaiety and misery, and celebrated their lot in both conditions with copious verse. Ruteboeuf is among the earliest French writers who tell us their personal history and make personal appeals. But he does not con fine himself to these. He discusses the history of his times, upbraids the nobles for their desertion of the Latin empire of Constantinople, considers the expediency of crusading, inveighs against the religious orders, and takes part in the disputes between the pope and the king. He composes pious poetry tao, and in at least one poem takes care to distinguish between the church which he venerates and the corrupt churchmen whom he lampoons. Besides Rutebcouf the most characteristic figure of his class and time is Adam Ad de la Halle (dr. 1240-1 286), commonly called the Hunchback la of Arras. The earlier poems of Adam are of a sentimental character, the later ones satirical and somewhat ill-tempered. Such, for instance, is his invective against his native city. But his chief importance consists in his jeux, the Jeu de la Feuillie, the Jeu de Robin et Marion, dramatic compositions which led the way to the ^regular dramatic form. Indeed the general tendency of the the 13th century is to satire, fable, and farce, even more than to serious or sentimental poetry. We should perhaps except the lais, the chief of La which are known under the name of Marie de France. These lays are exclusively Breton in origin, though not in application, and the term seems originally to have had re ference rather to the music to which they were sung than to the manner or matter of the pieces. Some resemblance to these lays may perhaps be traced in the Breton songs (perfectly trustworthy, which cannot be said of some more famous ones) published by M. Luzel. The subjects of the lais are indifferently taken from the Arthurian cycle, from ancient story, and from popular tradition. The most famous of all is the Lay of the Honey sucMe, traditionally assigned to Sir Tristram. Satiric and Didactic Works. Among the direct satirists of the Middle Ages, one of the earliest and foremost is Guyot de Provins, whose Bible, as he calls it, contains an elaborate satire on the time. The same spirit soon betrayed itself in curious travesties of the romances of chivalry, and some times invades the later specimens of these romances them selves. One of the earliest examples of the travestie is the remarkable composition entitled Attdigier. This poem, half fabliau and half romance, is not so much an instance of the heroi-comic poems which afterwards found so much favour in Italy and elsewhere, as a direct and ferocious parody of the Carlovingian epic. The hero Audigier is a model of cowardice and disloyalty ; his father and mother, Turgibus and Rainberge, are deformed and repulsive. The exploits of the hero himself are coarse and hideous failures, and the: whole poem can only be taken as a counterblast to the spirit of chivalry. Elsewhere a trouvere, prophetic of Rabelais, describes a vast battle between all the nations of the world, the quarrel being suddenly atoned by the arrival of a holy man bearing a huge flagon of wine. Again, wo have [the history of a solemn crusade undertaken by the citizens of a country town against the neighbouring castle. As erudition and the fancy for allegory gained ground, satire naturally availed itself of the opportunity thus afforded it ; the disputes of Philippe le Bel with the pope and the Templars had an immense literary influence, partly in the concluding portions of the Renart, partly in the Roman de Rose, still to be mentioned, and partly in other satiric allegories of which the chief is the romance of Fauvel. The hero of this is an allegorical personage, half man and half horse, signifying the union of bestial degrada tion with human ingenuity and cunning. Fauvel is a div inity in his way. All the personages of state, from kings and popes to mendicant friars, pay their court to him. But this serious and discontented spirit betrays itself also in compositions which are not parodies or travesties in form.