Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 8.djvu/793

Rh EVOLUTION 757 whole of the cosmos as a graduated scale of auimate existence. Aristotle. Aristotle is much nearer a conception of evolution than his master. It is true he sets out with a transcendent Deity, and follows Plato in viewing the crea tion of the cosmos as a process of descent from the more to the less perfect according to the distance from the original self-moving agency. Yet on the whole Aristotle leans to a teleological theory of evolution, which he inter prets dualistually by means of certain metaphysical distinc tions. Thus even his idea of the relation of the divine activity to the world shows, as Zeller and Lange remark, a tendency to a pantheistic notion of a divine thought which gradually realizes itself in the process of becoming. Aris totle s distinction of form and matter, and his conception of becoming as a transition from actuality to potentiality, provides a new ontological way of conceiving the process of material and organic evolution. 1 To Aristotle the whole of nature is instinct with a vital impulse towards some higher manifestation. Organic life presents itself to him as a progressive scale of complexity determined by its final end, namely, man. 2 In some respects Aristotle approaches the modern view of evolution. Thus, though he looked on species as fixed, being the realization of an unchanging formative principle (&amp;lt;ucm), he seems, as Ueberweg observes, to have inclined to entertain the possibility of a spontaneous generation in the case of the lowest organisms. Aristotle s teleological conception of organic evolution often approaches modern mechanical conceptions. Thus he says that nature fashions organs in the order of their necessity, the first being those essential to life. So, too, in his psychology he speaks of the several degrees of mind as arising accord ing to a progressive necessity. 3 In his view of touch and taste, as the two fundamental and essential senses, he may remind one of Mr Spencer s doctrine. At the same time Aristotle precludes the idea of a natural development of the mental series by the supposition that man contains, over and above a natural finite soul inseparable from the body, a substantial and eternal principle (vovs) which enters into the individual from without. Aristotle s brief suggestions respecting the origin of society and governments in the Politics show a leaning to a naturalistic interpretation of human history as a development conditioned by growing necessities. Strato. Of Aristotle s immediate successors one deserves to be noticed here, namely, Strato of Lampsacus, who de veloped his master s cosmology into a system of naturalism. Strato appears to reject Aristotle s idea of an original source of movement and life extraneous to the world in favour of an immanent principle. All parts of matter have an inward plastic life whereby they can fashion themselves to the best advantage, according to their capability, though not with consciousness. The Stoics. In the cosmology of the Stoics we have the germ of a monistic and pantheistic conception of evolution. All things are said to be developed out of an original being, which is at once material (fire) and spiritual (the Deity), and in turn they will dissolve back into this primordial source. At the same time the world as a developed whole is regarded as an organism which is permeated with the divine Spirit, and so we may say that the world-process is a self-realization of the divine Being. The formative principle or force of the world is said to contain the several rational germinal forms of things. Individual things are supposed to arise out of the original being, as animals and 1 Zeller says that through this distinction Aristotle first made possible the idea of development. 2 See this well brought out in Mr G. H. Lewes a Aristotle, p. 187._ way of conceiving the gradations of uiiiid (Aristotle, ii. 171). plants out of seeds. Individual souls are an efflux from the all-compassing world-soul. The necessity in the world s order is regarded by the Stoics as identical with the divine reason, and this idea is used as the basis of a teleological and optimistic view of nature. Very curious, in relation to modern evolutional ideas, is the Stoical doctrine that our world is but one of a series of exactly identical ones, all of which are destined to be burnt up and destroyed. Tlie Epicureans Lucretius. The Epicureans differed from the Stoics by adopting a purely mechanical view of the world-process. Their fundamental conception is that of Democritus; they seek to account for the formation of the cosmos, with its order and regularity, by setting out with the idea of an original (vertical) motion of the atoms, which somehow or other results in movements towards and from one another. Our world is but one of an infinite number of others, and all the harmonies and adaptations of the universe are regarded as a special case of the infinite pos sibilities of mechanical events. Lucretius regards the primitive atoms (first beginnings or first bodies) as seeds out of which individual things are developed. All living and sentient things are formed out of insentient atoms (e.g., worms spring out of dung). The peculiarity of organic and sentient bodies is due to the minuteness and shape of their particles, and to their special motions and combinations. So, too, mind consists but of extremely fine particles of matter, and dissolves into air when the body dies. Lucretius traces, in the fifth book of his poem, the progressive genesis of vegetal and animal forms out of the mother-earth. He vaguely anticipates the modern idea of the world as a sur vival of the fittest when he says that many races may have lived and died out, and that those which still exist have been protected either by craft, courage, or speed. Lucretius touches on ths development of man out of a primitive, hardy, beast-like condition. Pregnant hints are given respecting a natural development of language which has its germs in sounds of quadrupeds and birds, of religious ideas out of dreams and waking hallucinations, and of the art of music by help of the suggestion of natural sounds. Lucretius thus recognizes the whole range of exist ence to which the doctrine of evolution may be applied. Nco-Platonista. In the doctrines of the Neo-Platonists, of whom Plotinus is the most important, we have the world- process represented after the example of Plato as a series of descending steps, each being less perfect than its prede cessors, since it is further removed from the first cause. 4 The system of Plotinus, Zeller remarks, is not strictly speaking one of emanation, since there is no communication of the divine essence to the created world; yet it resembles emanation inasmuch as the genesis of the world is conceived as a necessary physical effect, and not as the result of voli tion. In Proclus we find this conception of an emanation of the world out of the Deity, or the absolute, made more exact, the process being regarded as threefold (1) persis tence of cause in effect, (2) the departure of effect from cause, and (3) the tendency of effect to revert to its cause. The Fathers. The speculations of the fathers respecting the origin and course of the world seek to combine Chris tian ideas of the Deity with doctrines of Greek philosophy. The common idea of the origin of things is that of an ab solute creation of matter and mind alike. The course of human history is regarded by those writers who are most concerned to refute Judaism as a progressive divine educa tion. Among the Gnostics we meet with the hypothesis of emanation, as, for example, in the curious cosmic theory of Yalentinus. Middle Ayes Early Schoolmen. In the speculative 4 Zeller observes that this scale of decreasing perfection is a necessary consequence of the idea of a transcendent deity.
 * Grote calls attention to the contrast between Plato s and Aristotle s