Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 5.djvu/219

Rh CATACOMBS 207 having to descend as once far down below the surface of tha earth.&quot; The earliest account of the Catacombs, that of St Jerome narrating his visits to them when a schoolboy at Rome, about 354 A.D. shows that interment in them was even then rare if it had not been altogether discon tinued ; and the poet Prudentius s description of the tomb of the Christian martyr Hippolytus, and the ceme tery in which it stood, leads us to the same conclusion. With the latter part of the 4th century a new epoch in the history of the Catacombs arose, that of religious reverence. .In the time of Pope Damasus, 366-384 A.D., the Catacombs had begun to be regarded with special devotion, and had become the resort of large bands of pilgrims, for whose guidance catalogues of the chief burial- places and the holy men buried in them were drawn up. Some of these lists are still extant. 1 Pope Damasus him self displayed great zeal in adapting the Catacombs to their new purpose, restoring the works of art on the walls, and renewing the epitaphs over the graves of the martyrs. In this latter work he employed an engraver named Furius Philocalus, the exquisite beauty of whose characters enables the smallest fragment of his work to be recognized at a glance. This, in Dean Milman s happy words, &quot; irreverent reverence, which converted the Catacombs from hidden and secret chambers, where piety might steal down to show its respect or affection for the dead, to, as it were, a great religi ous spectacle, the scene of devout pilgrimage to thousands &quot; (Milman, Essays, p. 489), gave rise to extensive alterations in their construction and decoration, which has much lessened their value as authentic memorials of the religious art of the 2d and 3d centuries. Subsequent popes manifested equal ardour, with the same damaging results, in the repair and adornment of the Catacombs, and many of the paintings which cover their walls, which have been too unquestion ing! y assigned to the period of their original construction, are really the work of these later times. The Catacombs shared in the devastation of Rome by the Goths under Vitiges, in the 6th century and by the Lombards at a later period; and partly through the spoliation of these barbarian invaders, partly through the neglect of those who should have been their guardians, they sank into such a state of decay and pollution that, as the only means of preserving the holy re mains they enshrined from further desecration, Pope Paul I., in the latter part of the 8th century, and Pope Paschal, at the commencement of the 9th, commenced the work of the translation of the relics, which was vigorously carried on by successive pontiffs until the crypts were almost entirely despoiled of their dead. The relics having been removed, the visits of pilgrims naturally ceased, and by degrees the very existence of those wonderful subterranean cemeteries was forgotten. Six centuries elapsed before the accidental discovery of a sepulchral chamber, by some labourers dig ging for pozzolana earth (May 31, 1578), revealed to the amazed inhabitants of Rome &quot; the existence,&quot; to quote a contemporary record, &quot; of other cities concealed beneath their own suburbs,&quot; Baronius, the ecclesiastical historian, was one of the first to visit the new discovery, and his &quot; Annals &quot; in more than one place evidence his just appreciation of its importance. The true &quot; Columbus of this subterranean world,&quot; as he has been aptly designated, was the indefatigable Bosio, who devoted his life to the personal investigation of the Catacombs, the results of 1 The most important of these lists are the two Itineraries belonging to the first half of the 7th century, in the Salzburg library. One still earlier, but less complete, appears in the Xotitia Urbis Romce, under the title Index Ccemeteriorum. Another Itinerary, preserved at Einsiedeln, printed by Mabillon, dates from the latter half of the same century. That found in the works of William of Malmesbury (Hardy s ed. vol. ii. pp. 539-544) appears to be copied from it, or both maybe from the same source. De Rossi gives a comparative table of these Itineraries and other similar lists. which were given to the world in 1632 in a huge folio, entitled Roma Sotterranea, profusely illustrated with rude but faithful plans and engravings. This was republished in a Latin translation with considerable alterations and omissions by Aringhi in 1651 ; and a century after its first appearance, the plates were reproduced by Bottari in 1737, and illustrated with great care and learning. Some additional discoveries were described by Boldetti in his Osservazioni, published in 1720 ; but, writing in the interests of the Roman Church with an apologetic not a scientific object, truth was made to bend to polemics, and little addition to our knowledge of the Catacombs is to be gained from his otherwise important work. The French historian of art, Seroux d Agincourt, 1825, by his copious illustrations, greatly facilitated the study of the architecture of the Catacombs and the works of art contained in them, The works of Raoul Rochette display a comprehensive knowledge of the whole subject, extensive reading, and a thorough acquaintance with early Christian art so far as it could be gathered from books, but he was not an original investigator. The great pioneer in the path of independent research, which, with the intelligent use of documentary and historical evidence, has led in our own day to so vast an increase in our acquaintance with the Roman Catacombs, was the late Padre Marchi of the Society of Jesus. His work, Monument i delle arti Christiane Primi tive, so disastrously interrupted by the political vicissitudes of the times, is the first in which the strange misconception, received with unquestioning faith by earlier writers, that the Catacombs were exhausted sand-pits adapted by the Christians to the purpose of interment, was dispelled, and the true history of their formation demonstrated. Marchi s line of investigation was followed by the Commendatore De Rossi, and his brother Michele, the former of whom was Marchi s fellow-labourer during the latter part of his explorations ; and it is to them that we owe the most exhaustive scientific examination of the whole subject, in its geological, architectural, ritual, epigraphic, and artistic aspects, in the two volumes of Roma Sotterranea, published in 1864 and 1867, as well as in the articles periodically published in the Bullettino di Archeologia Christiana. A very convenient abridgment of De Rossi s work has been produced in English under the same title by Dr Northcote, President of Oscott, and the Rev. W. R. Brownlow. The Catacombs of Rome are the most extensive with which we are acquainted, and, as might be expected in the centre of the Christian world, are in many respects the most remark able. No others have been so thoroughly examined and illustrated. These may, therefore, be most appropriately selected for description as typical examples. Our description of the Roman Catacombs cannot be more appropriately introduced than by St Jerome s account of his visits to them in his youth, already referred to, which &amp;gt; after the lapse of above fifteen centuries, presents a most accurate picture of these wonderful subterranean labyrinths. &quot; When I was a boy,&quot; he writes, &quot; receiving my education in Rome, I and my schoolfellows used, on Sundays, to make the circuit of the sepulchres of the apostles and martyrs. Many a time did we go down into the Catacombs. These are excavated deep in the earth, and contain, on either hand as you enter, the bodies of the dead buried in the wall. It is all so dark there that the language of the prophet (Ps. Iv. 15) seems to be fulfilled, Let them go down quick into hell. Only occasionally is light let in to mitigate the horror of the gloom, and then not so much through a win dow as through a hole. You take each step with caution, as, surrounded by deep night, you recall the words of Virgil &quot;Horror ubique animos, simul ipsa silentia terrent.&quot; 8 2 Hieron., Comment, in Ezech., lib. xx. c. 40. The translation is Dean Burgon s.