Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 17.djvu/474

Rh On June 29, 1686, Halley wrote to Newton: &quot;I am heartily sorry that in this matter, wherein all mankind ought to acknowledge their obligations to you, you should meet with anything that should give you unquiet&quot;; and then, after an account of Hooke s claim to the discovery as made at a meeting of the Koyal Society, in which he says, &quot;As to the manner of Mr Hooke s claiming the discovery, I fear it has been represented in worse colours than it ought ; for he neither made public application to the Society for justice, nor pretended you had all from him,&quot; he concludes : &quot; But I found that they were all of opinion that nothing thereof appearing in print, nor on the books of the Society, you ought to be considered as the inventor. And if in truth lie knew it before you, he ought not to blame any but himself for having taken no more care to secure a discovery, which he puts so much value on. What application he has made in private, I know not ; but I am sure that the Society have a very great satisfaction, in the honour you do them, by the dedication of so worthy a treatise. Sir, I must now again beg you, not to let your resentments run so high, as to deprive us of your third book, wherein the application of your mathematical doctrine to the theory of comets and several curious experiments, which, as I guess by what you write, ought to com pose it, will undoubtedly render it acceptable to those, who will call themselves Philosophers without Mathematics, which are much the greater number. Now you approve of the character and paper, I will push on the edition vigorously. I have sometimes had thoughts of having the cuts neatly done in wood, so as to stand in the page with the demonstrations. It will be more convenient, and not much more charge. If it please you to have it so, I will try how well it can be done ; otherwise I will have them in somewhat a larger size than those you have sent up. I am, Sir, your most affectionate humble servant, E. HALLEY.&quot; On June 30, 1686, the president was desired by the council to license Mr Newton s book, entitled Philosophise, Naturalis Principia Mathematica. On July 14, 1686, Newton wrote to Halley approving of his proposal to introduce woodcuts among the letter press, stating clearly the different things which he had from Hooke, and adding, &quot;And now having sincerely told you the case between Mr Hooke and me, I hope I shall be free for the future from the prejudice of his letters. I have considered how best to compose the present dispute, and I think it may be done by the inclosed scholium to the fourth proposition.&quot; This scholium was &quot;The inverse law of gravity holds in all the celestial motions, as was discovered also independently by my countrymen Wren, Hooke, and Halley.&quot; After this letter of Newton s the printing of the Principia was commenced, and went on with considerable regularity. The second book, though ready for the press in the autumn of 1686, was not sent to the printers until March 1687. The third book was presented to the Society on April 6, 1687, and the whole work published about midsummer in that year. It was dedicated to the Royal Society, and to it was prefixed a set of Latin hexameters addressed by Halley to the author. The work, as might have been expected, caused a great deal of excitement throughout Europe, and the whole of the impression was very soon sold. In 1691 a copy of the Principia was hardly to be procured. While Newton was writing the second and third books of the Principia, a very important event occurred at Cambridge which had the effect of bringing him before the public in a new light. James II. had already, in 1686, in open violation of the law, conferred the deanery of Christ Church at Oxford on John Massey, a person whose sole qualification was that he was a member of the Church of Rome ; and the king had boasted to the pope s legate that &quot; what he had done at Oxford would very soon be done at Cambridge.&quot; In accordance with this boast, in February 1687, he issued a mandate directing that Father Alban Francis, a Benedictine monk, should be admitted a master of arts of the university of Cambridge, without taking the oaths of allegiance and supremacy. Upon receiving the mandamus Dr Pechell, the master of Magdalene College, who was vice-chancellor, sent a messenger to the duke of Albemarle, the chancellor, to request him to get the mandamus recalled; and the registrary and the bedells waited upon Francis to offer him instant admission to the degree if only he would take the necessary oaths. Both the king and the monk were inexorable. The court and the university were thus placed in open collision. A menacing letter was despatched by Sunderland to shake the firmness of the university; but, though humble and respectful explanations were returned, the university showed no sign of compliance, nor even of a desire to suggest a compromise. In conse quence the vice-chancellor and deputies from the senate were summoned to appear before the High Commission Court at Westminister. Newton was one of the eight deputies appointed by the senate for this purpose. The deputies, before starting for London, held a meeting to prepare their case for the court. A compromise which was put forward by one of them was stoutly and success fully resisted by Newton, and on April 2 1 the deputation, with their case carefully prepared, appeared before the court. Jeffreys presided at the board. The deputation appeared as a matter of course before the commissioners, and were dismissed. On April 27 they gave in their plea. On May 7 it was discussed, and feebly defended by the vice-chancellor. The deputies maintained that in the late reign several royal mandates had been withdrawn, and that no degree had ever been conferred without the oaths having been previously taken. Jeffreys spoke with his accus tomed insolence to the vice-chancellor, silenced the other deputies when they offered to speak, and ordered them out of court. When recalled the deputies were reprimanded, and Pechell was deprived of his office as vice-chancellor, and of his emoluments as master of Magdalene. From the precincts of the High Commission Court Newton returned to Trinity College to complete the Principia. At the time when Newton was writing the latter part of this great work, he had an extensive correspondence with Halley, a very great part of which is extant. The fol lowing letter from Halley, dated London, July 5, 1687, announcing the completion of the Princijna, is of peculiar interest : &quot; I have at length brought your book to an end, and hope it will please you. The last errata came just in time to be inserted. I will present from you the book you desire to the Royal Society, Mr Boyle, Mr Paget, Mr Flamsteed, and if there be any else in town that you design to gratify that way ; and I have sent you to bestow on your friends in the University 20 copies, which I entreat you to accept. In the same parcel you will receive 40 more, which having no acquaintance in Cambridge, I must entreat you to put into the hands of one or more of your ablest booksellers to dispose of them. I intend the price of them, bound in calves leather, and lettered, to be 9 shillings here. Those I send you I value in quires at 6 shillings, to take my money as they are sold, or at 5 sh - for ready, or else at some short time ; for I am satisfied there is no dealing in books without interesting the booksellers; and I am contented to let them go halves with me, rather than have your excellent work smothered by their combinations. I hope you will not repent you of the pains you have taken in so laudable a piece, so much to your own and the nation s credit, but rather, after you shall have a little diverted yourself with other studies, that you will resume those contemplations wherein you had so great suc cess, and attempt the perfection of the lunar theory, which will be of prodigious use in navigation, as well as of profound and public speculation. Sir, I shall be glad to hear that you have received the books, and to know what farther presents you wish in town, which shall be accordingly done. You will receive a box from me on Thursday next by the waggon, that starts from town to-morrow.&quot; In 1692 and 1693 Newton seems to have had a serious illness, the nature of which has in late years given rise to very considerable dispute. In a letter dated September 13, 1693, addressed to Mr Pepys, he writes: &quot; Some time after Mr Millington had delivered your message, he pressed me to see you the next time I went to London. I wa^