Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 14.djvu/301

 L A N L A N 285 LANGENSALZA, chief town of a circle in the govern ment district of Erfurt, in the province of Saxony, Prussia, is situated on the Salz.i, about 20 miles north-east of Erfurt. It has an old castle, several schools of various grades, and three hospitals ; and near it are the remains of the old monastery of Homburg. The manufacture of cloth is the chief industry, but 1 ice, starch, and chemicals are also produced. The population of the town in 1875 numbered 9855. There is a sulphur bath in the neigh bourhood. Near Langensalza the Prussians and Han overians had a long and bloody engagement, June 27-29, 13GG, which ultimately resulted in the capitulation of the Litter. LAXGLAND, or LANGLEY, WILLIAM, the author of a reirurkable poem belonging to the close of the 14th century, of which the full title is The Vision of William concerning Piers the Plowman, together uith Vita de Do-ivel, Do-bet, et Do-best, secnndum Wit et Resoun. 1 Th 3 author s name is not quite certain, and the facts c morning his life are few and scanty. As to his Christian uams we are sure, from various allusions in the poem itself, ,uid the title Visio Willelmi, &c., in many MSS.; and we may at once reject the suggestion that his name may have been Robert. In no less than three MSS. occurs the following colophon : &quot; Explicit visio Willelmi W. de Petro le Plowman.&quot; What is here meant by W. it is difficult to conjecture ; but it is just possible that it may represent Wy eh wood (of which more presently), or Wigorniensis, i.e., of Worcester. As to the surname, ve find the note that a handwriting of the 15th century, on the fly-leaf of a MS. copy belonging to Lord Ashburnham ; and in a Dublin MS., is the note : &quot; Memorandum, quod Stacy de Piokayle, pater Willielmi de Langlond, qui Stacius fuit generosus, et morabatur in Schiptone-under-Whicwode, tenens clomini le Spenser in comitatu Oxon., qui preclictus Willielmus fecit librum qui vocatur Perys Ploughman.&quot; Nevertheless, it would seem that Langlanl should rather be Langley, since there is no trace of any Langland family in the midland counties, while the Langley family were wardens of Wychwood forest in Oxfordshire between the years 1278 and 1362. The question has been fully discussed by Professor Pearson in the North British Review, April 1870, p. 24 1. According to Bale, our author was born at Cleobury Mortimer, which is quite consistent with the supposition that his father may have removed from that place to Shipton in Oxfordshire, as there seems to have l)3en a real connexion between the families in those places. It must not be omitted that in the parish of Shipton-under- Wychwood there is a hamlet named Langley, from which he may have received his name. The internal evidence concerning the author is fuller and more satisfactory. By piecing together the various hints concerning himself which the poet gives us, we may compile the following account. His name was William (and probably Langley), and he was born about 1332 perhaps at Cleobury Mortimer in Shropshire. His father, who was doubtless a franklin or farmer, and his other friends put him to school, made a &quot;clerk&quot; or scholar of him, and taught him what Holy Writ meant. In 1362, at the age of about thirty, he found himself wandering upon the Malvern hills, and fell asleep beside a stream, and saw in a vision a field full of folk, i.e., this present world, and many other remarkable sights which he duly records. From this supposed circumstance he named his poem The Vision &amp;lt;&amp;gt;f William, though it is really a succession of visions, since he mentions several occasions on which he awoke, and 1 The title is usually given in Latin as Visio Will-el mi de Petro Plowman, &c.. and the whole work is sometimes briefly described as Liber de Petro I lowman. afterwards again fell asleep; and he even tells us of adventures which befel him in his waking moments. In some of these visions there is no mention of Piers tlu Plowman, but in others he describes him as being the coming reformer who was to remedy all abuses, and restore the world to a right condition. It is remarkable that Lis conception of this reformer changes from time to time, and becomes more exalted as the poem advances. At first he was no more than a ploughman, one of the true and honest labourers who are the salt of the earth ; but at last he is identified with the great reformer who has come already, the regenerator of the world in the person of Jesus Christ. We may, in fact, consider Piers the Plowman as represent ing Christ himself, or, in the author s own phrase &quot; Petrus est Christus.&quot; If this be borne in mind, it will not be possible to make the mistake into which so many have fallen, of speaking of Piers the Plowman as being the author, not the subject, of the poem. The author may best be called William, or we may even give him the nickname of Long Will, which, as he himself tell us, was bestowed upon him from his tallness of stature, just as the poet Gascoigne was familiarly called Long George. Though there is mention of the Malvern hills more than once near the beginning of the poem, it is abundantly clear that the poet lived for &quot; many years in Cornhill (London), with his wife Kitte and his daughter Calote.&quot; He seems to have come to London not long after the date of the first com mencement of his work, and to have long continued there. He describes himself as being a tall man, one who was loath to reverence lords or ladies or persons in gay apparel, and not deigning to say &quot; God save you &quot; to the sergeants whom he met in the street, insomuch that many people took him to be a fool. He was very poor, wore long robes, and had a shaven crown, having received the clerical tonsure. But he seems only to have taken minor orders, and earned a precarious living by singing the placebo, dirige, and seven psalms for the good of men s souls. The fact that he was married may explain why he never rose in the church. But he had another source of livelihood in his ability to write out legal documents, and he was extremely familiar with the law courts at Westminster. His leisure time must have been entirely occupied with his devotion to his poem, which was essentially the work of his lifetime. He was not satisfied with rewriting it once, but he actually rewrote it twice ; and from the abundance of the MSS. which still exist we can see its development from the earliest draught, written about 1362, to its latest form, written after 1390. It is remarkable that the intermediate form, written later than 1370, is perhaps, taken upon the whole, the best of the three. In 1399, just before the deposition of Richard II., appeared a poem addressed to the king, who is designated as &quot; Richard the Iledeles,&quot; i.e., devoid of counsel. This poem, occurring in only one MS., in which it is incomplete, breaking off abruptly in the middle of a page, may safely be attributed to the same author, who was, at the time, passing through Bristol. As he was then about sixty-seven years of age, we may be sure that he did not long surviw the accession of Henry IV. It may here be observed that the well-known poem entitled Pierce Ploughman s Cral&amp;lt; though excellently written, is certainly an imitation by another hand, viz., by the anonymous author of The Plowman s Tale, which is inserted in the black-letter editions of Chaucer, though it is none of his. The Pierce Ploughman of the Crede is very different in conception from the subject of William s vision. As regards the poem itself, it has been already said that it exists in three forms. If we denote these by the names of A-text, B-text, and C-text, we find, of the first, twelve MSS. ; of the second, six teen ; and of the third, also sixteen MSS. A few of these show confusion between the different types, but they may roughly be
 * Robert or William Langland made pers ploughman,&quot; in