Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 14.djvu/218

 206 LA FONTAINE rule of modern criticism, each in its kind, and judged simply according to their rank in that kind, they fall far below the merits of the two great collections of verse narratives which have assured La Fontaine s immortality. Between the actual literary merits of the two there is not much to choose, but the change of manners and the altered standard of literary decency has thrown the Oontcs into the shade. These tales are identical in general character with those which amused Europe from the days of the early fabliau writers through the period of the great Italian novellicri to that of the second great group of French tale-tellers ranging from Antoine de la Salle to Beroalde do Verville, Light love, the misfortunes of husbands, the cunning of wives, the breach of their vows by ecclesiastics, constitute the staple of their subject. In some respects La Fontaine is the best of such tile-tellers, while he is certainly the latest who deserves such excuse as may be claimed by a writer who does not choose indecent subjects from a deliberate knowledge that they are considered indecent and with a deliberate desire to pander to a vicious taste. No one who followed him in the style can claim this excuse ; Ire can, and the way in which contemporaries of stainless virtue such as Madame de Sevigne speak of his work shows that though the new public opinion was growing up it was not finally accepted. In the Contes La Fontaine for the most part attempts little originality of theme. He takes his stories (varying them it is true in detail not a little) from Boccaccio, from Marguerite, from the Cent Nouvelles Nouvcllcs, &c. He applies to them his marvellous power of easy sparkling narration, and his hardly less marvellous faculty of saying more or less outrageous things in the most polite and gentlemanly manner. These Contes have indeed certain drawbacks. They are not penetrated by the half pagan ardour for physical beauty and the delights of sense which animates and excuses the early Italian Renaissance. They have not the subtle mixture of passion and sensuality, of poetry and appetite, which distinguishes the work of Marguerite and of the Pleiade. They are emphatically conies pour rire, a genuine expression of the esprit gaulois of the fabliau writers and of Rabelais, destitute of the grossuess of envelope which had formerly covered that spirit. A comparison of &quot;La Fiancee du Roi de Garbe &quot; with its original in Boccaccio (especially if the reader takes M. Emile Montegut s admirable essay as a commentary) will illustrate better than anything else what they have and what they have not. Some writers have pleaded hard for the admission of actual passion of the poetical sort in such pieces as &quot;La Courtisane Amoureuse,&quot; but as a whole it must be admitted to be absent. The Fables, with hardly less animation and narrative art than the Contes, are free from disadvantages (according to modern notions) of subject, and exhibit the versatility and fecundity of the author s talent perhaps even more fully. La Fontaine had of course many predecessors in the fable and especially in the beast fable. In his first issue, comprising what are now called the first six books, ho adhered to the path of these predecessors with some closeness ; but in the later collections he allowed himself far more liberty, and ft is in these parts that his genius is most fully manifested. The boldness of the politics is as much to be considered as the ingenuity of the moralizing, as the intimate knowledge of human nature dis played in the substance of the narratives, or as the artistic mastery shown in their form. It has sometimes been objected that the view of human character which La Fontaine expresses is unduly dark, and resembles too much that of La Rochefoucauld, for whom the poet had certainly a profound admiration. The discussion of this point would lead us too far here. It may only be said that satire (and La Fontaine is eminently a satirist) necessarily concerns itself with the dark rather more than with the lighter shades. Indeed the objection has become pretty nearly obsolete with the obsolescence of what may be called the sentimental-ethical school of criticism. Its last overt expression was made some thirty years ago, in a curious outburst of Lamartine s, excellently answered by Sainte-Beuve. Exception has also been taken to the Fables on more purely literary grounds by Lessing, but, as this exception depends on differences inevitable between those who would shape all literature on rules derived from the study of Greek models and those who with the highest respect for those models rank them only among and not above others, it is equally needless to enter into it. Perhaps the best criticism ever passed upon La Fon taine s Fables is that of Silvestre de Sacy, to the effect that they supply three several delights to three several ages : the child re joices in the freshness and vividness of the story, the eager student of literature in the consummate art with which it is told, the ex perienced man of the world in the subtle reflexions on character and life w lich it conveys. Nor has anyone, with the exception of a few paradoxers like Rousseau and a few sentimentalists like Lamartine, denied that the moral tone of the whole is as fresh and healthy as its literary interest is vivid. The book has therefore naturally become the standard reading book of French both at home and abroad, a position which it shares in verse with the Telemaque of Fenelon in prose. It is no small testimony to its merit that not even this use or misuse has interfered with its popu larity among French men of letters, who, with hardly an exception, speak as affectionately of it as if they had never been kept in on a summer s day to learn La Cigale ct la Fourmi. The general literary character of La Fontaine is, with allowance made for the diii erence of subject, visible equally in the Fallen and in the Contes, and it is necessary to say a few words as to the nature of this character. Perhaps one of the hardest sayings in Preach literature for an English student is the dictum of Joubert to the effect that &quot; II y a dans La Fontaine une plenitude de poesie qu on ne trouve nulle part dans les autres auteurs Franais. &quot; Most English critics would probably admit at once La Fontaine s claim to a position in the first class of writers, but would demur to his admission to the first class of poets. The difference arises from the ambiguity of the terms. In Joubert stime, and perhaps a good deal later, inventiveness of fancy and diligent observation of the rules of art were held to complete the poetical differentia, and in both these La Fontaine deserves if not the first almost the first place among French poets. As to the first point there is hardly any dispute ; few writers either in French or any other language have ever equalled him in this respect. In his hands the oldest story becomes novel, the most hackneyed moral piquant, the most commonplace details fresh and appropriate. As to the second point there has not been such unanimous agreement. It used to be considered that La Fon taine s ceaseless diversity of metre, his archaisms, his licences in rhyme and orthography, were merely ingenious devices for the sake of easy writing, intended to evade the trammels of the stately coup let and rimes difficilcs enjoined by Boileau. Lamartine in the attack already mentioned affects contempt of the &quot; vers boiteux, disloques, inegaux, sans symmetric ni dans 1 oreille ni sur la page.&quot; This opinion may be said tp have been finally exploded by the most accurate metrical critic and one of the most skilful metri cal practitioners that France has ever had, M. Theodore do Banville; and it is only surprising that it should ever have been entertained by any professional maker of verse. There can be little doubt that La Fontaine saw the drawbacks of the &quot;Alexandrine prison,&quot; as it has been called, but in freeing himself from it he by no means took refuge in merely pedestrian verse. His irregularities are strictly regulated, his cadences carefully arranged, ami the whole effect may be said to be (though of course in a light and tripping measure in stead of a stately one) similar to that of the stanzas of the English pindaric ode in the hands of Dryden or Collins. There is there fore nothing against La Fontaine on the score of invention and nothing on the score of art. But something more, at least according to English standards, is wanted to make tip a plenitude of poesy,&quot; and this something more La Fontaine seldom or never exhibits. In words used by Joubert himself elsewhere, he never &quot;transports.&quot; The faculty of transporting is of course possessed and used in very different manners by different poets. In some it takes the form of passion, in some of half mystical enthusiasm for nature, in some of commanding eloquence, in some of moral fervour. La Fontaine has none of these things: he is always amusing, always sensible, always clever, sometimes even affecting, but at the same time always more or less prosaic, were it not for his admirable ver sification. The few passages which may be cited to the contrary are doubtfully admissible, and cannot in any case suffice to leaven so great a mass of other work. It is needless to say that this is no dis credit to him. A man can but be the very best in his own special line, and that very best La Fontaine assuredly is. He is not a great poet, and a deficiency very similar to that which deprives him of this name deprives him of the name of a great humorist ; but he is the most admirable teller of light tales in verse that has ever existed in any time or country ; and he has established in his verse-tale a model which is never likely to be surpassed, and which has enriched literature with much delightful work. La Fontaine did not during his life issue any complete edition of his works, nor even of the two greatest and most important divisions of them. The most remarkable of his separate publications have already been noticed. Others were the Poemc de la Captirite de St Male (1673), one of the pieces inspired by the Port-Royalists, the Poeme du Quinquina (1602), a piece of task work also, though of a very different kind, and a number of pieces published either in small pamphlets or with the works of other men. Among the latter may be singled out the pieces published by the poet with the works of his friend Maucroix (1685). The year after his death some post humous works appeared, and some years after his son s death the scattered poems, letters, &c., with the addition of some unpublished work bought from the family in manuscript, were carefully edited and published as (Euvrcs Diverscs (1729). During the 18th cen tury two of the most magnificent illustrated editions ever published of any poet reproduced the two chief works of La Fontaine. The Fables were illustrated by Oudry (1755-59), the Contes by Eisen (1762). This latter under the title of &quot;Edition des Fermiers- Gene raux &quot; fetches a high price. During the first thirty years of the present century Walckenaer, a great student of French 17th cen tury classics, published for the house of Didot three successive editions of La Fontaine, the last (1826-27) being perhaps entitled to the rank of the standard edition. More recently the editions of M. Marty-Laveaux in the BiUiotheque EMvirenne, A. Pauly in the