Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 13.djvu/533

 LITERATURE.] ITALY 511 specially from this point of view that some historians have placed Tasso in the literary period generally known under the name of &quot; Secentismo,&quot; and that others, more . moderate in their criticism, have said that he prepared the way for it. dodof 5. Period of Decadence. From about 1559 began a e&amp;gt; rule oppressed and corrupted the peninsula. The minds of men were day by day gradually losing their force ; every high aspiration was quenched. No love of country could any longer be felt when the country was enslaved to a stranger. The suspicious rulers fettered all freedom of thought and word; they tortured Campanella, burned Bruno, made every effort to extinguish all high sentiment, all desire for good. Cesare Balbo says, &quot; if the happiness of the masses consists in peace without industry, if the nobility s consists in titles without power, if princes are satisfied by acquiescence in their rule without real independ ence, without sovereignty, if literary men and artists are content to write, paint, and build with the approbation of their contemporaries, but to the contempt of posterity, if a whole nation is happy in ease without dignity and the tranquil progress of corruption, then no period ever was so happy for Italy as the hundred and forty years from the treaty of Gateau Cambresis to the war of the Spanish . Se- succession.&quot; This period is known in the history of Italian tismo. literature as the Secentismo. Its writers, devoid of senti ment, of passion, of thoughts, resorted to exaggeration ; they tried to produce effect with every kind of affectation, with bombast, with the strangest metaphors, in fact, with what in art is called mannerism, &quot;barocchism.&quot; The utter poverty of the matter tried to cloak itself under exuberance of forms. It seemed as if the writers vied with one another as to who could best burden his art with useless metaphors, with phrases, with big-sounding words, with affectations, with hyperbole, with oddities, with every thing that could fix attention on the outer form and draw it off from the substantial element of thought. At the head of the school of the &quot;Secentisti&quot; comes Giovan Battista Marini of Naples, born in 1569, especially known by a poem called L Adone. His aim was to excite wonder by novelties; hence the most extravagant meta phors, the most forced antitheses, the most far-fetched conceits, are to be found in his book. It was especially by antitheses that he thought he could produce the greatest effect. Sometimes he strings them together one after the other, so that they fill up whole stanzas without a break. Achillini of Bologna followed in Marini s steps. He had less genius, however, and hence his peculiarities were more extravagant, becoming indeed absolutely ridi culous. In general, we may say that all the poets of the 17th century were more or less infected with &quot;Marinism.&quot; Thus Alessandro Guidi, although he does not attain to the exaggeration of his master, is emptily bombastic, inflated, turgid, while Fulvio Testi is artificial and affected. Yet Guidi as well as Testi felt the influence of another poet, Gabriello Chiabrera, born at Savona in 1552. In him the Secentismo took another character. Enamoured as he said he was of the Greeks, he made new metres, especially in imitation of Pindar, treating of religious, moral, historical, and amatory subjects. It is easy to understand that a Pindaric style of poetry in the 17th century in Italy could not but end in being altogether arti ficial, without anything of those qualities which constitute the greatness of the Greek poet. Chiabrera, though elegant enough in form, proves empty of matter, and, in his vain attempt to hide this vacuity, has recourse to poetical orna ments of every kind. These again, in their turn, become in him a fresh defect. Nevertheless, Chiabrera s school, in the decadence of the 17th century, marks an improvement; and sometimes he showed that he had lyrical capacities, which in better literary surroundings would have brought forth excellent fruit. When he sings, for example, of the victories of the Tuscan galleys against the Turks and the pirates of the Mediterranean, he rises to grand imagery, and seems quite another poet. Filicaia the Florentine has a certain lyric clan, particu larly in the songs about Vienna besieged by the Turks, which seems to raise him more than the others above the vices of the time ; but even in him we see clearly the rhetorical artifice and the falseness of the conceits. And in general all the lyric poetry of the 17th century may be said to have had the same defects, but in different degrees, defects which may be summed up as absence of feeling and exaggeration of form. There was no faith; there was no love; and thus art became an exercise, a pastime, a luxury, for a servile and corrupt people. The belief then arose that it would be sufficient to change The the form in order to restore literature, in forgetfulness that every reform must be the effect of a change in social and moral conditions. Weary of the bombastic style of the 17th century, full of conceits and antithesis, men said let us follow an entirely different line, let us fight the turgid style with simplicity. In 1G90 the &quot;Academy of Arcadia&quot; was instituted. Its founders were Giovan Maria Crescirn- beni and Gia,n Vincenzo Gravina. The Arcadia was so called because its chief aim and intention were to imitate in literature the simplicity of the ancient shepherds, who were fabulously supposed to have lived in Arcadia in the golden age. As the &quot; Secentisti &quot; erred by an overweening- desire for novelty, which made them always go beyond the truth, so the Arcadians proposed to themselves to return to the fields of truth, always singing of subjects of pastoral simplicity. This was obviously nothing else than the substitution of a new artifice for the old one ; and they fell from bombast into effeminacy, from the hyperbolical into the petty, from the turgid into the over-refined. The Arcadia was a reaction against Secentismo, but a reaction which, reversing the movement of that earlier epoch, only succeeded in impoverishing still further and completely withering up the literature. The poems of the &quot; Arcadians : fill many volumes, and are made up of sonnets, madrigals, canzonets, and blank verse. The one who most distinguished himself among the sonneteers was Felice Zappi. Among the authors of songs Paolo Piolli was illustrious. Innocenzo Frugoni was more famous than all the others, a man of fruitful imagination but of shallow intellect, whose wordy verses nobody now reads. Whilst the political and social conditions in Italy in the Symp- 1 7th century were such as to make it appear that every light to s of of intelligence, all spirit of liberty, was extinguished, there g^g^|jf i appeared in the peninsula, by that law of reaction which p rose. in great part governs human events, some strong and in dependent thinkers, such as Bernardino Telesio, Giordano Bruno, Tommaso Campanella, Lucilio Vanini, who turned philosophical inquiry into fresh channels, and opened the way for the scientific conquests of Galileo Galilei, the great - contemporary of Descartes in France and of Bacon in Englanrl. Galileo was not only a great man of science, but also occupied a conspicuous place in the history of letters. A devoted student of Ariosto, he seemed to trans fuse into his prose the qualities of that great poet, a clear and frank freedom of expression, a wonderful art of knowing how to say everything with precision and ease, and at the same time with elegance. Galileo s prose is in perfect antithesis to the poetry of his time. Perhaps it is the best pross that Italy has ever had ; it is clear, goes straight to the point, is without rhetorical ornaments and without vulgar slips, artistic without appearing to be so. Another symptom of revival, a sign of rebellion against Satire,
 * ad- period of decadence in Italian literature. The Spanish