Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 13.djvu/492

 472 ITALY [HISTORY. in proportion as the people gained more power in the field the consuls rose into importance, superseded the bishops, and began to represent the city in transactions with its neighbours. Popes and emperors, who needed the assist ance of a city, had to seek it from the consuls, and thus these officers gradually converted an obscure and indefinite authority into what resembles the presidency of a common wealth. They were supported by a deliberative assembly, called credenza, chosen from the more distinguished citizens. In addition to this privy council, we find a gran comifflio, consisting of the burghers who had established the right to interfere immediately in public affairs, and a .still larger assembly called parhimento, which included the whole adult population. Though the institutions of the communes varied in different localities, this is the type to which they all approximated. It will be perceived that the type was rather oligarchical than strictly democratic. Between the parlamento and the consuls with their privy council, or credenza, was interposed the gran consiglio of privileged burghers. These formed the aristocracy of the town, who by their wealth and birth held its affairs within j their custody. There is good reason to believe that, when | the term popolo occurs, it refers to this body and not to the j whole mass of the population. The comiine included the entire city bishop, consuls, oligarchy, councils, handi- j craftsmen, proletariate. The popolo was the governing ! or upper class. It was almost inevitable in the transition from feudalism to democracy that this intermediate ground should be traversed ; and the peculiar Italian phrases, ! prinio popolo, secondo pojwlo, terzo popolo, and so forth, j indicate successive changes, whereby the oligarchy passed from one stage to another in its progress toward absorption in democracy or tyranny. Under their consuls the Italian burghs rose to a great height of prosperity and splendour. Pisa built her Duomo. Milan undertook the irrigation works which enriched the soil of Loinbardy for ever. Massive walls, substantial edifices, commodious seaports, good roads, were the benefits conferred by this new government on Italy. It is alsj to be noticed that the people now began to be con scious of their past. They recognized the fact that their blood was Latin as distinguished from Teutonic, and that they must look to ancient Rome for those memories which constitute a people s nationality. At this epoch the study of Roman law received a new impulse, and this is the real meaning of the legend that Pisa, glorious through her con suls, brought the pandects in a single codex from Amalfi. The very name consul, no less than the Romanizing char- acter of the best architecture of the time, points to the same revival of antiquity. Republic The rise of the Lombard communes produced a sympa- inKome. thetic revolution in Rome, which deserves to be mentioned in this place. A monk, named Arnold of Brescia, animated with the spirit of the Milanese, stirred up the Romans to shake off the temporal sway of their bishop. He attempted, in fact, upon a grand scale what was being slowly and quietly effected in the northern cities. Rome, ever mind ful of her antique past, listened to Arnold s preaching. A senate was established, and the republic was proclaimed. The title of patrician was revived and offered to Conrad, king of Italy, but not crowned emperor. Conrad refused it, and the Romans conferred it upon one of their own nobles. Though these institutions borrowed high-sounding titles from antiquity, they were in reality imitations of the Lombard civic system. The patrician stood for the consuls. The senate, composed of nobles, represented the credenza and the gran consiglio. The pope was unable to check this revolution, which is now chiefly interesting as further proof of the in?urgence of the Latin as against the feudal elements in Italy at this period. Though the communes gained so much by the war of Mu investitures, the division of the country between the pope s P al and emperor s parties was no small price to pay for inde pendence. It inflicted upon Italy the ineradicable curse of party-warfare, setting city against city, house against house, and- rendering concordant action for a national end impos sible. No sooner had the compromise of the investitures been concluded than it was manifest that the burghers of the now enfranchised communes were resolved to turn their arms against each other. We seek in vain an obvious motive for each separate quarrel. All we know for certain is that, at this epoch, Rome attempts to ruin Tivoli, and Venice Pisa ; Milan fights with Cremona, Cremona with Crema, Pavia with Verona, Yerona with Padua, Piacenza with Parma, Modena and Reggio with Bologna, Bologna and Faenza with Ravenna and Imola, Florence and Pisa with Lucca and Siena, and so on through the whole list of cities. The nearer the neighbours, the more rancorous and internecine is the strife ; and, as in all cases where animosity is deadly and no grave local causes of dispute are apparent, we are bound to conclude that some deeply- seated permanent uneasiness goaded these fast growing communities into rivalry. Italy was, in fact, too small for her children. As the towns expanded, they perceived that they must mutually exclude each other. They fought for bare existence, for primacy in commerce, for the command of seaports, for the keys of mountain passes, for rivers, roads, and all the avenues of wealth and plenty. The pope s cause and the emperor s cause were of comparatively little moment to Italian burghers ; and the names of Guelf and Ghibelline, which before long began to be heard in every street, on every market-place, had no meaning for them. These watchwords are said to have arisen in Germany during the disputed succession of the empire between 1135 and 1152, when the Welfs of Bavaria opposed the Swabian princes of Waiblingen origin. But in Italy, although they were severally identified with the papal and imperial parties, they really served as symbols for jealousies which altered in complexion from time to time and place to place, expressing more than antagonistic poli tical principles, and involving differences vital enough to split the social fabric to its foundation. Under the imperial rule of Lothar the Saxon (1125-1137) Sw; and Conrad the Swabian (1138-1152), these civil wars em l increased in violence owing to the absence of authority. 10 Neither Lothar nor Conrad was strong at home ; the former had no influence in Italy, and the latter never entered Italy at all. But when Conrad died, the electors chose his nephew Frederick, surnamed Barbarossa, who united the rival Fre honours of Welf and Waiblingen, to succeed him ; and it Bai was soon obvious that the empire had a master powerful of ^ brain and firm of will. Frederick immediately determined L O I to reassert the imperial rights in his southern provinces, citi and to check the warfare of the burghs. When he first crossed the Alps in 1154. Lombardy was, roughly speaking, divided between two parties, the one headed by Pavia pro fessing loyalty to the empire, the other headed by Milan ready to oppose its claims. The municipal animosities of the last quarter of a century gave substance to these factions ; yet neither the imperial nor the anti-imperial party had any real community of interest with Frederick. He came to supersede self-government by consuls, to deprive the cities of the privilege of making war on their own account, and to extort his regalian rights of forage, food, and lodging for his armies. It was only the habit of inter- urban jealousy which prevented the communes from at once combining to resist demands which threatened their liberty of action, and would leave them passive at the pleasure of a foreign master. The diet was opened at Roncaglia near Piacenza, where Frederick listened to the