Page:Encyclopædia Britannica, Ninth Edition, v. 11.djvu/652

Rh 618 HEGEL Hegel s Philosophy. Hegelianism is confessedly one of the most difficult of all philoso phies. Every one has heard the legend which makes Hegel say, &quot; One man has understood me, and even he has not. &quot; He abruptly hurls us into a world where old habits of thought fail us. In three places indeed he has attempted to exhibit the transition to his own system from other levels of thought ; but in none with much success. In the introductory lectures on the philosophy of religion he gives a rationale of the difference between the modes of consciousness in religion and philosophy (between Vorstdlung and Begriff). In the beginning of the Encyclopddie he discusses the defects of dogmatism, empiricism, the philosophies of Kant and Jacobi. In the first case he treats the formal or psychological aspect of the difference ; in the latter he presents his doctrine less in its essential character than in special relations to the prominent systems of his time. The Phenomenology of Spirit, regarded as an introduction, suffers from a different fault. It is not an introduction for the philosophy which it was to introduce was not then fully elaborated. Even to the last Hegel had not so externalized his system as to treat it as something to be led up to by gradual steps. His philosophy was not one aspect of his intellectual life, to be con templated from others ; it was the ripe fruit of concentrated re flexion, and had become the one all-embracing form and principle of his thinking. More than most thinkers he had quietly laid himself open to the influences of his time, and the lessons of history. The Phenomenology is the picture of the Hegelian philosophy in the making, at the stage before the scaffolding has been removed from the building. For this reason the book is at once the most brilliant and the most difficult of Hegel s works, the most brilli ant because it is to some degree an autobiography of Hegel s mind, not the abstract record of a logical evolution, but the real history of an intellectual growth ; the most difficult because, instead of treating the rise of intelligence (from its first appearance in contrast with the real world to its final recognition of its presence in, and rule over, all things) as a purely subjective process, it exhibits this rise as wrought out in historical epochs, national characteristics, forms of culture and faith, and philosophical systems. The theme is identical with the introduction to the Encyclopadie ; but it is treated in a very different style. From all periods of the world, from mediaeval piety and stoical pride, Kant and Sophocles, science and art, religion and philosophy, with disdain of mere chronology, Hegel gathers in the vineyards of the human spirit the grapes from which he crushes the wine of thought. The human mind coming through a thousand phases of mistake and disappointment to a sense and realization of its true position in the universe, such is the drama which is consciously Hegel s own history, but is represented objectively in the field of the world as the process of spiritual his tory which the philosopher wakes into consciousness and reproduces in himself. The Phenomenology stands to the Encyclopadie some what as the dialogues of Plato stand to the Aristotelian treatises. It contains almost all his philosophy but irregularly and without due proportion. The personal element gives an undue prominence to recent and contemporary phenomena of the philosophic atmo sphere. It is the account given by an inventor of his own discovery, not the explanation of an outsider. It therefore to some extent assumes from the first the position which it proposes ultimately to reach, and gives, not a proof of that position, but an account of the experience (Erfahruny) by which consciousness is forced from one position to another till it finds rest in Absolutes Wissen. It is impossible in a mere resume to do justice to this remarkable work, which is neither a mere psychology, nor logic, nor moral philosophy, nor history, but is all of these at once and a great deal more. What the Phenomenology wants is not distillation, but ex pansion and illustration from contemporary and antecedent thought and literature. It treats of the attitudes of consciousness towards reality under the six heads of consciousness, self-consciousness, reason (Vernunft), spirit (G-cist), religion, and absolute knowledge. The native attitude of consciousness towards existence is reliance on the evidence of the senses ; but a little reflexion is sufficient to show that the reality attributed to the external world is as much due to intellectual conceptions as to the senses, and that these conceptions slip through our fingers when we try to fix them. If consciousness cannot detect a permanent object outside it, so self-consciousness cannot find a permanent subject in itself. It may, like the Stoic, assert freedom, by holding aloof from the entanglements of real life, or like the sceptic regard the world as a delusion, or finally, as the &quot; unhappy consciousness &quot; (UnglucJcliches Bewusstseyn), may be a recurrent falling short of a perfection which it has placed above it in the heavens. But in this isolation from the world, self-conscious ness has closed its gates against the stream of life. The perception of this is reason. Reason convinced that the world and the soul are alike rational observes the external world, mental phenomena, and specially the nervous organism, as the meeting ground of body and mind. But reason finds much in the world recognizing no kindred with her, and so turning to practical activity seeks in the World the realization of her own aims. Either in a crude way she pursues her own pleasure, and finds that necessity counteracts her cravings ; or she endeavours to find the world in harmony with the heart, and yet is unwilling to see fine aspirations crystallized by the act of realizing them. Finally, unable to impose upon the world either selfish or humanitarian ends, she folds her arms in pharisaic virtue, with the hope that some hidden power will give the victory to righteousness. But the world goes on in its life, heedless of the demands of virtue. The principle of nature is to live and let live. Reason abandons her efforts to mould the world, and is content to let the aims of individuals work out their results independently, only stepping in to lay down precepts for the cases where individual actions conflict, and to test these precepts by the rules of formal logic. So far we have seen consciousness on one hand and the real world on the other. The stage of &quot; Geist &quot; reveals the consciousness no longer as critical and antagonistic but as the indwelling spirit of a community, as no longer isolated from its surroundings but the union of the single and real consciousness with the vital feeling that animates the community. This is the lowest stage of concrete con sciousness life, and not knowledge ; the spirit inspires, but does not reflect. It is the age of unconscious morality, when the indi vidual s life is lost in the society of which he is an organic im-inber. But increasing culture presents new ideals, and the mind, absorb ing the ethical spirit of its environment, gradually emancipates it self from conventions and superstitions. This &quot; Aufklamng &quot; pre pares the way for the rule of conscience, for the moral view of the world as subject of a moral law. From the moral world the next step is religion ; the moral law gives place to God ; but the idea of God head, too, as it first appears is imperfect, and has to pass through the forms of nature-worship and of art, before it reaches a full utter ance in Christianity. Religion in this shape is the nearest step to the stage of absolute knowledge ; and this absolute knowledge &quot;the spirit knowing itself as spirit &quot;is not something which leaves these other forms behind but the full comprehension of them as the organic constituents of its empire; &quot; they are the memory and the sepulchre of its history, and at the same time the actuality, truth, and certainty of its throne.&quot; Here, according to Hegel, is the field of philosophy. The preface to the Phenomenology signalled the separation from Schelling the adieu to romantic. It declared that a genuine philosophy has no kindred with the mere aspirations of artistic minds, but must earn its bread by the sweat of its brow. It sets its face against the idealism which either thundered against the world for its deficiencies, or sought something finer than reality. Philosophy is to be the science of the actual world it is the spirit comprehending itself in its own externalizations and manifestations. The philosophy of Hegel is idealism, but it is an idealism in which every idealistic unification has its other face in the multiplicity of existence. It is realism as well as idealism, and in its highest speculations never quits its hold on facts. Compared with Fichte and Schelling, Hegel has a sober, hard, realistic character. At a later date, with the call of Schelling to Berlin in 1841, it became fashionable to speak of Hegelianism as a negative philosophy requir ing to be complemented by a &quot;positive&quot; philosophy which would give reality and not mere ideas. The cry was the same as that of Krug (more than once alluded to by Hegel) asking the philosophers who expounded the absolute to construe his pen. It was the cry of the Evangelical school for a personal Christ and not a dialectical Logos. Philosophy, as Schelling says, was asked to supply the real God and not the mere conception of Him. Experimental science complained that the real world of matter and force had been supplanted by a fantastic tissue of logical forms and ethereal processes. The claims of the individual, the real, material, and historical fact had been sacrificed, it was said, by Hegel, to the universal, the ideal, the spiritual, and the logical. There was a truth in these criticisms. It was the very aim of Hegelianism to render fluid the fixed phases of reality, to show ex istence not to be an immovable rock limiting the efforts of thought, but to have thought implicit in it, waiting for release from its petrifaction. Nature was no longer, as with Fichte, to be a mere spring-board to evoke the latent powers of the spirit. Nor was it, as in Schelling s earlier system, to be a collateral progeny with mind from the same womb of indifference and identity. Nature and mind in the Hegelian system the external and the spiritual worldhave the same origin, but are not co-equal branches. The natural world proceeds from the &quot;idea,&quot; the spiritual from the idea and nature. It is impossible, beginning with the natural world, to explain the mind by any process of distillation or develop ment, unless consciousness or its potentiality has been there from the first. Reality, independent of the individual consciousness, there must be ; reality, independent of all mind, is an impossibility. At the basis of all reality, whether material or mental, there is thought. But the thought thus regarded as the basis of all existence is not con sciousness with its distinction of ego and non-ego. It is rather the stuff of which both mind and nature are made, neither extended as in the natural world, nor self-centred as in mind. Thought in its primary form is, as it were, thoroughly transparent and absolutely