Page:Eminent Chinese Of The Ch’ing Period - Hummel - 1943 - Vol. 2.pdf/255

 tsung who had died two years previously. In 1804 he was ordered to retire. In that year he celebrated the sixtieth anniversary of his becoming a hsiu-ts'ai. Three years later, on the sixtieth anniversary of his becoming a chü-jên, Emperor Jên-tsung conferred on him the rank of an official of the third grade, which seven years later, on the sixtieth anniversary of his becoming a chin-shih, was raised to the second grade. On his eightieth birthday he was honored by a large number of scholars and officials, including envoys from Korea. His eye-sight was remarkably good; and to test it he is said to have made it a practice, on the first day of every year, to write four characters on each of ten sesame seeds. Even in 1818, at the age of eighty-six sui, he attempted this feat, but was exhausted after writing on six of them. Within a month he died.

Wêng Fang-kang was an authority on inscriptions on stone and bronze (金石學), and on calligraphy and painting. His well-known work on epigraphy of the Han dynasty, entitled 兩漢金石記 Liang-Han chin-shih chi, 22 chüan, was printed in 1789 at Nanchang, Kiangsi. During his years as commissioner of education in Kwangtung he described a number of ancient and contemporary inscriptions from that province in a work entitled 粵東金石略 Yüeh-tung chin-shih lüeh, 12 chüan, printed in 1771. His 蘇米齋蘭亭考 Su-Mi chai Lan-t'ing k'ao, 8 chüan, completed in 1803, is a treatise on various copies of the famous Script of the Orchid Pavillion (Lan-t'ing hsü), written by Wang Hsi-chih (see under ) near Shaohsing, Chekiang, in the year 353 A. D. In addition to the above-mentioned works, Wêng wrote many notes on specific bronzes, paintings, and masterpieces of calligraphy—notes which are brought together in a prose collection, 復初齋文休 Fu-ch'u chai wên-chi, 35 chüan, printed in 1836 and in 1877. His collection of verse, entitled Fu-ch'u chai shih-chi, 66 chüan, was printed in 1814, followed soon after by a second collection in 4 chüan. In 1917 a supplement of 24 chüan of verse and 4 chüan of prose was printed in the Chia-yeh t'ang ts'ung-shu (see ), under the title Fu-ch'u chai chi-wai shih-wên chi. Wêng wrote 4 chronological account of his own life up to the year of his death, entitled 翁氏家事略記 Wêng-shih chia-shih lüeh-chi, which was printed by.

Wêng Fang-kang took exception to the theory of that the essence of poetry consists of a mysterious "spiritual harmony" (shên-yün). He preferred to stress the substance (肌理) in each poem, and this was perhaps in keeping with his preference for the kind of study pursued by the School of Han Learning (see under ). Nevertheless he admired Wang, and while in Shantung (1793), printed a number of the latter's works on poetry under the collective title 小石帆亭著錄 Hsiao-shih-fan t'ing chu-lu. Wêng, moreover, edited several anthologies of verse after a pattern set by Wang. To show his admiration for the two Sung celebrities, Su Shih and Mi Fei (see under and  respectively), he named one of his studios Su-Mi chai 蘇米齋. He commented on the poems of the former in a work entitled 蘇詩補注 Su-shih pu-chu (1782), 8 chüan, supplementing and correcting previous comments by ; and compiled a chronological biography of the latter under the title 米海岳年譜 Mi Hai-yüeh nien-p'u. He compiled a similar biography of the poet, Yüan Hao-wên (see under ), under the title Yüan I-shan nien-p'u. During his leisure years (1801–04) as guardian of the tomb of Kao-tsung, he completed commentaries on Mencius, the Odes, the Analects, and the Book of Rites, a total of 14 chüan, which are printed in the Chi-fu ts'ung-shu (see under ). Other commentaries by him are listed but are not known to be extant. He also made supplements and corrections to Ching-i k'ao which were published in 12 chüan under the title Ching-i k'ao pu-chêng (補正, 1792). Eighteen of his works are collected in the Su-chai ts'ung-shu (reprinted in 1924).

Wêng Fang-kang lived in a time of bitter antagonism between the followers of the School of Sung Philosophy and the School of Han Learning (for both see ). Having intimate friends in both Schools, he attempted to mediate between their extreme views. He extolled the Sung philosophers for their ethical and social teachings, but charged their followers with narrow-mindedness on the ground that they concerned themselves chiefly with the interpretation of a few treatises. He lent his full approval to the new methods of textual criticism and etymological and historical research practiced by the exponents of the School of Han Learning, but found fault with some of them for neglecting what seemed to him the main purpose of classical studies—namely, the promulgation of the Confucian philosophy of life expounded by Chu Hsi (see under ) and his followers. Though on many occasions he lauded the scholarship of 857