Page:East European Quarterly, vol15, no1.pdf/30

 [project] by Bakunin in French” (Žáček, Slovanský sjezd, p. 361n). In all likelihood, Bakunin’s federative scheme and his recommendations for the manifesto are in fact the same document. In his later Confession (1851) to Tsar Nicholas I, Bakunin referred to only one proposal that he presented to the congress. Moreover, when Libelt’s new agenda was unveiled in the Polish-Ukrainian section on June 7, Bakunin emphatically opposed issuing separate manifestos to the European nations and to the Slavs. He recommended issuing “a simple declaration of principles.” Protocol in Wisłocki, Kongres słowianski, p. 116. Bakunin’s proposal was first published in Polish in the Lvov daily Dziennik Narodowy, August 31 and September 5, 1848, Nos. 132, 136, pp. 554–555, 568.

See Otakar Odložilík, “Pokus o soudní vyšetřování Fr. Palackého r. 1848,” Národní Osvobození (Prague), May 26, 1926, No. 143.

July 3, 1848, in Gedenkblätter, pp. 167–169.

Protocol of questioning on July 15, 1848, in Státní ústřední archiv (Prague), fond: Vyšetřovací komise 1848, fasc. 52/2. Portions of Turánsky’s testimony are reprinted in Žáček, Slovanský sjezd, pp. 454–459. On the Turánsky affair, see my “The Investigation of the June 1848 Uprising in Prague: The Strange Case of Marcel Turánsky,” East European Quarterly, VIII (1974), pp. 57–69. Palacký later rejected this accusation as pure fabrication (Politisches Vermächtniss, p. 12).

Windischgrätz’s report was printed in Prager Zeitung, August 4, 1848, No. 30.

Their joint statement of August 10 was published in Wiener Zeitung, August 19, 1848, No. 227, p. 66.

Verhandlungen des österreichischen Reichstages nach der stenographischen Aufnahme (Vienna, 1848-49), V, pp. 342–345.

Noviny Lípy Slovanské, January 2–5, 28491849 [sic], Nos. 1–4. See also Josef Kočí, “Česká politika a Bakuninův ‘Hlas k Slovanům,’” Slovanské historické studie, X (1974), pp. 113–140; and my “The Echo of Bakunin’s Appeal to the Slavs (1848),” Canadian-American Slavic Studies, X (1976), pp. 489–501.

January 19, 1849, No. 16.

“Nothgedrungene Erklärung,” Prager Zeitung, January 26, 1849, No. 22; and in Czech, “Wynucené wyjádření,” Národní Nowiny, January 27, 1849, No. 23, p. 89.

Printed in Václav Čejchan, Bakunin v Čechách (Prague, 1928), pp. 193–200. In his Confession, Bakunin later denounced “the pretensions of the Czech politicians,” who at the Slav Congress had sought to rule a Slav-dominated Austria. V. Polonskii, ed., Materialy dlia biografii M. Bakunina (Moscow & Petrograd/Leningrad, 1923–33), 1, p. 149. Cf. Václav L. Beneš, “Bakunin and Palacký’s Concept of Austroslavism” Indiana Slavic Studies, II (1958), pp. 79–111.

Betrachtungen über die Zeitverhältnisse, insbesondere im Hinblicke auf Böhmen (Prague, 1849), pp. 96–97.

From Moraczewski’s manuscript “O kongresie słowiánskim w Pradze, zebranym 31 maja 1848,” in Žáček, Slovanský sjezd, p. 515. This passage on Palacký was deleted from the published version of Moraczewski’s account of the congress: Opis pierwszego Zjazdu słowianskiego (Poznań, 1848).

Ed. Josef Jirásek (Bratislava, 1931), pp. 185 ff. Štúr’s manuscript was first published in 1867 under the Russian title Slavianstvo i mir budushchago.

Friedrich Engels, Germany: Revolution and Counter-Revolution, in The German Revolutions, ed. L. Krieger (Chicago, 1967), pp. 177–180. Engels’ work originally appeared in the New York Daily Tribune in 1851–52 under Marx’s name.

See pp. 9–14.