Page:EB1911 - Volume 27.djvu/906

 of which is, perhaps, Jakob Van Maerlant (Amsterdam, 1860), helped the Flemish revival in Belgium as powerfully as his school-books. He is best known, however, as the writer of ballads and songs. Jongelingsdroomen (“A Young Man’s Dreams”) first appeared at Antwerp and Amsterdam in 1853. These poems were followed by Levensbeelden (“Life Figures or Pictures,” Amsterdam, 1858) and by Gevoel en Leven (“Feeling—Living,” Amsterdam, 1861). His Rijzende Bladen (“Rising Leaves”) first made its appearance at Ghent and Rotterdam in 1883. In the following year an édition de luxe of his poetry was published, adorned with pen-and-ink sketches by Jan van Beers the younger, and a popular edition of his collected poems was published at Ghent and Rotterdam in 1873 and 1884. Among the best known are De Blinde (“Blind”), De Zieke Jongeling (“Young and Doomed”), Bij ’t Kerkportaal (“At the Church Porch”). Van Beers’s poetry, full of glow and pathos, simple yet forcible, is somewhat akin to that of. Van Beers died at Antwerp on the 14th of November 1888.

VANBRUGH, SIR JOHN (1664-1726), British dramatist and architect, was born in the parish of St Nicolas Acons in the City of London, and christened on the 24th of January 1664. His grandfather, Gillis van Brugg, of Ghent, migrated to England in the reign of James I., was naturalized, resided as a merchant and was buried in the parish of St Stephen’s Walbrook. The dramatist’s father, Giles (1631-1689), a wealthy sugar baker, who married into the Carleton family, was driven from London by the plague and settled at Chester. The mother (Elizabeth Carleton, of the Dorchester family) survived to see her son famous; she died at Claygate, near Esher, in 1711, and was buried at Thames Ditton. After a few years at the King’s School, Chester, John at nineteen was sent to France to study the arts; after two years’ absence he returned to take up a commission in the regiment soon to be known as the 13th Foot. In the early autumn of 1690 Vanbrugh was arrested at Calais on a charge of espionage. The informant against him was a lady. He was imprisoned at Vincennes, but on the 1st of Feb. 1692, by a lettre de cachet, he was removed to the Bastille. On the 12th of November he found surety to the extent of one thousand pistoles, but was confined to the fortifications of Paris until his exchange was effected on the cartel. His enforced leisure was responsible for the first draft of the Provok’d Wife. said in his Lettres sur les Anglais that he could not imagine what had gained such a comic writer the distinction of detention in such a grim fortress. As a matter of fact, a considerable number of English officers were arrested about this time on a similar charge, as may be seen from the Bastille archives. For a time after his return he resumed his commission and was known as Captain Vanbrugh.

The production of Love’s Last Shift at the Theatre Royal in January 1696 kindled afresh his attachment to the comic muse. He thought it would be interesting to develop the situation upon which Cibber had rung down the curtain, and the result was The Relapse, “got, conceived and born in six weeks’ space.” It was given on Boxing Day 1696, with Cibber as Foppington, one of the three parts borrowed from the preceding comedy. The Sir Novelty Fashion of Cibber was developed in this play into Lord Foppington, who has been pronounced “the best fop ever brought upon the stage.” The play has been revived in various forms: adapted it in A Trip to Scarborough, and it inspired two modern versions in 1870 and 1890, The Man of Quality and Miss Tomboy. Aesop—produced at Drury Lane immediately after The Relapse—was an adaptation of Boursault’s dramatic sermon on the same subject. It ran for a week only, but the success of The Relapse was so triumphant that Montague, afterwards Lord Halifax, asked at once for the Provok’d Wife for the theatre in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, and it was produced at that theatre in May 1697. All that could be said in answer to those who condemned it on account of its unblushing libertinism was that Sir John Brute is sufficiently brutal to drive any woman into rebellion, and that since the glorious days of the Restoration a wife’s rebellion and a wife’s adultery were synonymous terms. The play was a complete triumph, and Brute was one of great parts. Vanbrugh was fiercely attacked by for immorality in 1698, and wrote nothing more for the stage until 1700, when an adaptation of the Pilgrim of  was produced at Drury Lane. In this play, in the part of Alinda, scored her first success. Two years later appeared The False Friend, a version of Le Sage’s Traître puni. Other adaptations from the French were A Country House, from Dancourt’s Maison de campagne; Confederacy (1705), from the same author’s Bourgeoises à la mode; Squire Trelooby (1704), a version of Monsieur de Pourceaugnac; and The Mistake (1705), from Molière’s Depit amoureux.

Collier’s attack and the resulting movement must have been responsible in part for “Van” turning his attention to architecture. The demand for splendid country seats in the new Palladian style was steadily increasing, and his reputation as a modern wit was an introduction in itself. In 1702 he was entered as comptroller of the Royal Works (now the Board of Works, where several of his designs may still be seen). In 1703 he wrote to ask his friend Jacob Tonson to procure him a “Palladio,” and in the same year he was a commissioner at Greenwich, where the secretary William Vanbrugh was a kinsman of his own, whom had appointed at his request. In the meantime, Vanbrugh had been appointed architect to the earl of Carlisle, and the result, completed in 1714, was the Corinthian mansion of Castle Howard. The work is an extension of the Palladian plan introduced by, with the addition of immense corridors in segmental colonnades leading from the main entrance to the wing blocks. From a scenic artist’s point of view, it is a magnificent (and certainly his best) piece of work. The earl, then deputy earl-marshal, testified his satisfaction by procuring for Vanbrugh a high place in the College of Arms. In March 1704 he was actually promoted Clarenceux, though he not only knew nothing of heraldry but had openly ridiculed that grave science in Aesop. The indignant college protested in vain, and the architect stuck to his place. His next work was to prepare designs for Kneller Hall near Hounslow. But the success of Castle Howard now caused him to entertain the rash project of building a theatre in the Haymarket, from his own design, for the acting of his own plays. The joyous courage with which, having persuaded thirty people in the fashionable world to aid him in finding the money, and to aid him in finding the plays, he began to build in perfect unconsciousness of the danger before him, is the only passage in his life which may be called pathetic, save of course his struggle with the “wicked woman of Marlborough.” The magnitude of Vanbrugh’s architectural ideas grew as the work went on, and with the ideas the structure grew till a theatre meant for the delicate bijouterie work of polite comedy seemed growing to the proportions of the Roman Colosseum. Whether Congreve endeavoured to put a check upon his friend’s architectural and authorial fervour does not appear. But it must be remembered that not only Vanbrugh’s plays but his own were to be acted there, and that, although Congreve was a man of great sagacity, no man, not even he who pretended to set his gentility above his genius, is sagacious when confronted by the surpassing excellence of his own poems and plays. When at length the time came to test the acoustics of the pile, it was found to be sadly defective. What changes were made to rectify the errors of structure does not appear. The theatre was opened to the public with an Italian opera, which was followed by three of Molière’s comedies, and these by the Confederacy, Vanbrugh’s masterpiece on the whole, though perhaps its finest scenes are not equal to the finest scenes in The Relapse.

Vanbrugh at last withdrew from the disastrous speculation; Congreve had already withdrawn. But a man to whom Fortune had been so kind as she had been to Vanbrugh could hardly be depressed by any of her passing frowns. Queen Anne at once sent him abroad on an important state errand, and afterwards