Page:EB1911 - Volume 18.djvu/753

 of their rivers will no longer present barriers to the entrance of the Union forces. The ironclad intruder will thus prove a severe monitor to those leaders ‘Downing Street’ will hardly view with indifference this last ‘Yankee notion,’ this monitor.” It is also the name of an ironclad railway truck used for carrying a big gun. In America the raised part of the roof of a railway carriage or omnibus in which the lights or ventilators are placed is known as a monitor roof or top. In mining the word is applied to a jointed nozzle which may be turned in all directions, and is used in hydraulic mining.

MONK (or ), GEORGE, (1608–1660), second son of Sir Thomas Monk, a gentleman of good family but in embarrassed circumstances, was born at Potheridge, near Torrington, in Devonshire, on the 6th of December 1608. Having thrashed the under-sheriff of the county in revenge for a wrong done to his father, he had to leave home, and naturally took to the career of arms. He served as a volunteer in the expedition to Cadiz, and the next year did good service at the Isle of Rhé. In 1629 Monk went to the Low Countries, then the school of War, and there he gained a high reputation as a leader and disciplinarian. In 1638 he threw up his commission in consequence of a quarrel with the civil authorities of Dordrecht, and came to England. He obtained the lieutenant-colonelcy of Newport’s regiment. During the operations on the Scottish border he showed his skill and coolness in the dispositions by which he saved the English artillery at Newburn, though himself destitute of ammunition. At the outbreak of the Irish rebellion he was appointed colonel of Lord Leicester’s regiment. All the qualities for which he was noted through life—his talent of making himself indispensable, his imperturbable temper and his impenetrable secrecy—were fully displayed in this employment. The governorship of Dublin was vacant, and Monk was appointed by Leicester. But Charles I. overruled the appointment in favour of Lord Lambart, and Monk with great shrewdness gave up his claims. Ormonde, however, who viewed him with suspicion as one of the two officers who refused the oath to support the Royal cause in England, sent him under guard to Bristol. But he justified himself to Charles in person, and his soldierly criticisms on the conduct of the Irish War impressed the king, who gave him a command in the corps sent over from Ireland during the English Civil War. Monk was, however, soon taken prisoner, at Nantwich (1644), and spent the next two years in the Tower, where he found it difficult to live owing to his want of means. The king himself sent him £100, a gift for which Monk himself was sincerely grateful. He beguiled his imprisonment by writing his Observations on Military and Political Affairs.

Monk’s Irish experience, however, led to his release and an invitation to take service in the parliament’s army against the Irish rebels. Making a distinction like other soldiers of the time between fighting the Irish and taking arms against the king, he accepted the offer and took the covenant. At first as adjutant-general to the Parliamentary lord-lieutenant, his old friend Lord Lisle, and afterwards as governor of Ulster, he rendered great services to his new masters. In conjunction with Colonel Michael Jones, governor of Leinster, he made head against the rebels for two years, but in the third (1649) the Parliamentarians, weakened by defections brought about by the execution of the king, were no longer able to keep the field. Losing one strong place after another, Monk concluded an armistice with the rebel Owen Roe O’Neill upon terms which he knew the parliament would not ratify. The convention was indeed a military expedient to deal with a military necessity, and although most of his army went over to the Royalist cause, he himself remained faithful to his employers and returned to England. As he expected, parliament “utterly disapproved” of the armistice but exonerated their general. His next service was in Cromwell’s army in Scotland. He commanded a brigade at the great victory of Dunbar, and afterwards captured a number of small places. When in 1651 Cromwell with the field army hurried southward into England to bring the invading Scots to battle, Monk was left behind to complete the subjugation of the country. In February 1652 he left Scotland to recruit his broken health at Bath, and in November of the same year he became an admiral, or rather a “general at sea,” instead of a soldier. Ten days after hoisting his flag for the first time he was engaged with his colleagues, Blake and Deane, in the battle of Portland (Feb. 18, 1653). In the action of June 2–3 Monk exercised the general command after Deane’s death. A third battle followed on the 29th and 30th of July, which was a decisive victory for the Commonwealth’s fleet (see ). On his return he married Anne Clarges, a woman of low extraction, often supposed to have been his mistress, “ever a plain homely dowdy,” says Pepys, who, like other writers who mention her, is usually still less complimentary. Next year he was back in Scotland, methodically beating down a Royalist insurrection in the Highlands, and when this service was over settled down to a steady government of the country for the next five years. The timely discovery of a plot fomented by Overton, his second in command, in 1654, gave him an excuse for thoroughly purging his army of all Anabaptists, Fifth Monarchy men, and other dangerous enthusiasts. It is improbable that at this time Monk had proposed to himself the restoration of the king, though so astute a diplomatist must have weighed the chances of such an event. His very reticence, however, caused alarm on one side and hope on the other. In 1655 he received a letter from Charles II., a copy of which he at once sent to Cromwell, who is said to have written to him in 1657 in the following terms: “There be that tell me that there is a certain cunning fellow in Scotland called George Monk, who is said to lye in wait there to introduce Charles Stuart; I pray you, use your diligence to apprehend him, and send him up to me.” Monk’s personal relations with Cromwell were those of sincere friendship on both sides.

During the confusion which followed Cromwell’s death Monk remained silent and watchful at Edinburgh, careful only to secure his hold on his troops. At first he contemplated armed support of Richard Cromwell, but gave up this idea on realizing the young man’s incapacity for government, and renewed his waiting policy. In July 1659 direct and tempting proposals were again made to him by the king. His brother Nicholas, a clergyman, was employed by Sir J. Grenvil to bring to him the substance of Charles’s letter. No bribe, however, could induce him to act one moment before the right time. He bade his brother go back to his books, and refused to entertain any proposal. But when Booth rose in Cheshire for the king, so tempting did the opportunity seem that he was on the point of joining forces with him, and a manifesto was prepared. His habitual caution, however, induced him to wait until the next post from England, and the next post brought news of Booth’s defeat.

For a moment he thought of retiring into private life, but soon Fleetwood and Lambart declared against the parliament, and to their surprise Monk not only refused to join them, but (Oct. 20, 1659) at once took measures of active opposition. Securing his hold on Scotland by a small but trusty corps of occupation, he crossed the border with the rest of his army. Holding Lambart in play without fighting until his army began to melt away for want of pay, Monk received the commission of commander-in-chief of the parliament’s forces (Nov. 24). The navy, some of the English garrisons and the army in Ireland declared for the parliament, and the army from Scotland crossed the Tweed on the 2nd of January 1660. It was inferior in number, but in all other respects superior to Lambart’s, and Monk slowly marched on to London, disbanding or taking over on his way the detachments of Lambart’s army which he met, and entered the capital on the 3rd of February. In all this his ultimate purpose remained mysterious. At one moment he secretly encouraged the demands of the Royalist City of London, at another he urged submission to the existing parliament, then again he refused to swear an oath abjuring the house of Stuart, and further he hinted to the attenuated Long Parliament the urgent necessity of a dissolution. Lastly, acting as the stern military agent of the infuriated parliament, he took away the gates and portcullises of the city. This angered not only the