Page:EB1911 - Volume 08.djvu/267

 the bands comes about in a very curious way, as is shown by a circumstance first observed by Brewster. When the retarding plate is held on the side towards the red of the spectrum, the bands are not seen. Even in the contrary case, the thickness of the plate must not exceed a certain limit, dependent upon the purity of the spectrum. A satisfactory explanation of these bands was first given by Airy (Phil. Trans., 1840, 225; 1841, 1), but we shall here follow the investigation of Sir G. G. Stokes (Phil. Trans., 1848, 227), limiting ourselves, however, to the case where the retarded and unretarded beams are contiguous and of equal width.

The aperture of the unretarded beam may thus be taken to be limited by x = −h, x = 0, y = −l, y= +l; and that of the beam retarded by R to be given by x = 0, x = h, y= −l, y = +l. For the former (1) § 3 gives $- \frac{1}{\lambda f}\int^{0}_{- h}\int^{+l}_{- l}\sin k\left\{ at - f + \frac{x\xi + y\eta}{f}\right\}dxdy$

on integration and reduction.

For the retarded stream the only difference is that we must subtract R from at, and that the limits of x are 0 and +h. We thus get for the disturbance at, , due to this stream

If we put for shortness for the quantity under the last circular function in (1), the expressions (1), (2) may be put under the forms u sin, v sin ( − ) respectively; and, if I be the intensity, I will be measured by the sum of the squares of the coefficients of sin  and cos in the expression u sin + v sin ( − ), so that I＝u2 + v2 + 2uv cos , which becomes on putting for u, v, and their values, and putting

If the subject of examination be a luminous line parallel to, we shall obtain what we require by integrating (4) with respect to from −∞ to +∞. The constant multiplier is of no especial interest so that we may take as applicable to the image of a line

If R =, I vanishes at = 0; but the whole illumination, represented by ∫ +∞ −∞ I d, is independent of the value of R. If R = 0, I = $1⁄^{2}$ sin2 $2h⁄f$, in agreement with § 3, where a has the meaning here attached to 2h.

The expression (5) gives the illumination at due to that part of the complete image whose geometrical focus is at  = 0, the retardation for this component being R. Since we have now to integrate for the whole illumination at a particular point O due to all the components which have their foci in its neighbourhood, we may conveniently regard O as origin. is then the co-ordinate relatively to O of any focal point O′ for which the retardation is R; and the required result is obtained by simply integrating (5) with respect to from −∞ to +∞. To each value of corresponds a different value of, and (in consequence of the dispersing power of the plate) of R. The variation of  may, however, be neglected in the integration, except in 2R/, where a small variation of  entails a comparatively large alteration of phase. If we write

we must regard as a function of, and we may take with sufficient approximation under any ordinary circumstances

where ′ denotes the value of at O, and  is a constant, which is positive when the retarding plate is held at the side on which the blue of the spectrum is seen. The possibility of dark bands depends upon being positive. Only in this case can cos {′ + ( − 2h/f) } retain the constant value -1 throughout the integration, and then only when

and

The first of these equations is the condition for the formation of dark bands, and the second marks their situation, which is the same as that determined by the imperfect theory.

The integration can be effected without much difficulty. For the first term in (5) the evaluation is effected at once by a known formula. In the second term if we observe that {{center|cos {′ +( − 2h/f) }＝cos {′ − g1} ＝cos ′ cos g1 + sin ′ sin g1,}} we see that the second part vanishes when integrated, and that the remaining integral is of the form $w = \int^{+\infty}_{- \infty}\sin^2 h_{1}\xi \cos g_{1}\xi \frac{d\xi}{\xi^2},$ where

By differentiation with respect to g1 it may be proved that The integrated intensity, ′, or 2h1 + 2 cos w, is thus

when g1 numerically exceeds 2h1; and, when g1 lies between ±2h1, {{MathForm2|(12).|＝{2h1 + (2h1 − &radic; g12) cos ′}}

It appears therefore that there are no bands at all unless lies between 0 and +4h1, and that within these limits the best bands are formed at the middle of the range when  = 2h1. The formation of bands thus requires that the retarding plate be held upon the side already specified, so that be positive; and that the thickness of the plate (to which  is proportional) do not exceed a certain limit, which we may call 2T0. At the best thickness T0 the bands are black, and not otherwise.

The linear width of the band (e) is the increment of which alters  by 2, so that

With the best thickness

so that in this case

The bands are thus of the same width as those due to two infinitely narrow apertures coincident with the central lines of the retarded and unretarded streams, the subject of examination being itself a fine luminous line.

If it be desired to see a given number of bands in the whole or in any part of the spectrum, the thickness of the retarding plate is thereby determined, independently of all other considerations. But in order that the bands may be really visible, and still more in order that they may be black, another condition must be satisfied. It is necessary that the aperture of the pupil be accommodated to the angular extent of the spectrum, or reciprocally. Black bands will be too fine to be well seen unless the aperture (2h) of the pupil be somewhat contracted. One-twentieth to one-fiftieth of an inch is suitable. The aperture and the number of bands being both fixed, the condition of blackness determines the angular magnitude of a band and of the spectrum. The use of a grating is very convenient, for not only are there several spectra in view at the same time, but the dispersion can be varied continuously by sloping the grating. The slits may be cut out of tin-plate, and half covered by mica or “microscopic glass,” held in position by a little cement.

If a telescope be employed there is a distinction to be observed, according as the half-covered aperture is between the eye and the ocular, or in front of the object-glass. In the former case the function of the telescope is simply to increase the dispersion, and the formation of the bands is of course independent of the particular manner in which the dispersion arises. If, however, the half-covered aperture be in front of the object-glass, the phenomenon is magnified as a whole, and the desirable relation between the (unmagnified) dispersion and the aperture is the same as without the telescope. There appears to be no further advantage in the use of a telescope than the increased facility of accommodation, and for this of course a very low power suffices.

The original investigation of Stokes, here briefly sketched, extends also to the case where the streams are of unequal width h, k, and are separated by an interval 2g. In the case of unequal width the bands cannot be black; but if h = k, the finiteness of 2g does not preclude the formation of black bands.

The theory of Talbot’s bands with a half-covered circular aperture has been considered by H. Struve (St Peters. Trans., 1883, 31, No. 1).

The subject of “Talbot’s bands” has been treated in a very instructive manner by A. Schuster (Phil. Mag., 1904), whose point of view offers the great advantage of affording an instantaneous explanation of the peculiarity noticed by Brewster. A plane pulse, i.e. a disturbance limited to an infinitely thin slice of the medium, is supposed to fall upon a parallel grating, which again may