Page:Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization - Court opinion draft, February 2022.pdf/38

38 Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985) (rejecting the principle that the Commerce Clause does not empower Congress to enforce requirements, such as minimum wage laws, against the States "in areas of traditional governmental functions") (overruling National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U. S. 833 (1976)); Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983) (the Fourth Amendment requires a totality of the circumstances approach for determining whether an informant's tip establishes probable cause) (overruling Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U. S. 108 (1964) and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U. S. 410 (1969)); United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82 (1978) (the Double Jeopardy Clause does not apply to Government appeals from orders granting defense motions to terminate a trial before verdict) (overruling United States v. Jenkins, 420 U. S. 358 (1975)); Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976) (gender-based classifications are subject to intermediate scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause) (overruling Goesaert v. Cleary, 335 U. S. 464 (1948)); Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975) (jury system which operates to exclude women from jury service violates the defendant's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to an impartial jury) (overruling Hoyt v. Florida, 368 U. S. 57 (1961)); Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) (per curiam) (the mere advocacy of violence is protected under the First Amendment unless it is directed to incite or produce imminent lawless action) (overruling Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357 (1927)); Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) (Fourth Amendment "protects people, not places" and extends to what a person "seeks to preserve as private") (overruling Olmstead v. United States, 277 U. S. 438 (1928) and Goldman v. United States, 316 U. S. 129 (1942)); Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) (procedural safeguards to protect the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination) (overruling Crooker v. California, 357 U. S. 433 (1958), and Cicenia v. La Gay, 357 U. S. 504 (1958)); Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964) (the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is also protected by the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgement by the States) (overruling Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U. S. 78 (1908) and Adamson v. California, 332 U. S. 46 (1947)); Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964) (congressional districts should be apportioned so that "as nearly as practicable one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's") (overruling in effect Colegrove v. Green, 328 U. S. 549 (1946)); Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) (right to counsel for indigent defendant in a criminal prosecution in state court under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments) (overruling Betts v. Brady, 316 U. S. 455 (1942)); Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) (federal courts have jurisdiction to consider constitutional challenges to state redistricting plans) (effectively overruling in part Colegrove v. Green, 328 U. S. 549 (1946)); Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) (the exclusionary rule regarding the