Page:Discourse Concerning Unlimited Submission.djvu/51

 pleaure of one ingle man; (who has naturally no uperiority over them in point of authority) o that their etates, and every thing that is valuable in life, and even their lives alo, hall be abolutely at his dipoal, if he happens to be wanton and capricious enough to demand them. What unprejudiced man can think, that God made ALL to be thus ubervient to the lawles pleaure and frenzy of ONE, o that it hall always be a in to reit him! Nothing but the mot plain and expres revelation from heaven could make a ober impartial man believe uch a montrous, unaccountable doctrine, and, indeed, the thing itelf, appears o hocking—o out of all proportion, that it may be quetioned, whether all the miracles that ever were wrought, could make it credible, that this doctrine really came from God. At preent, there is not the leat yllable in Scripture which gives any countenance to it. The hereditary, indefeaible, divine right of kings, and the doctrine of nonreitance which is built upon the uppoition of uch a right, are altogether as fabulous and chimerical, as tranubtantiation; or any of the mot aburd reveries of ancient or modern viionaries. Thee notions are fetched neither from divine revelation, nor human reaon; and if they are derived from neither of thoe ources, it is not much matter from whence they come, or whither they go. Only it is a pity that uch doctrines hould be propagated in ociety, to raie factions and rebellions, as we ee they have, in fact, been both in the lat, and in the preent, REIGN.

then, if unlimited ubmiion and paive obedience to the higher powers, in all poible caes, be not a duty,