Page:Delineation of Roman Catholicism.djvu/82

 re.d/ Scsire. How exe. r.w, these rules, are led  re e Sces  g ien  r e Bible, i.e., y m nev ce ence n fm eir ed e acq  e wo Ve few ever apply for lice m re; for ey , for e t  for herefi ff they apply for a license  e bh. How my in western Pennsylv, where I now , apply m  Plelpa for a pege  re or  a Dotmy Bible ? Add , t when e pvilege is ven  a n of mmrd �e Bible, how by is such a one r  unded e rd G ? h  no wonder t e knowledge d Scgre  cely thg of  e m Caoc Church. The ave  e et ciphne of e Chh of Rome on  t, which eve pm p  und on OTH  believe d eorce. (3.) Wm cge e Roman Cathobos th  word of , d fwm s chae it is imible m exc em. They ve  ong opted the circdafion of e Segares vemar le of e ple. en Wickfie phed on, Pope Ore sent a b m e Udvei of Oo, 1378, nde le lator  "r into a detble d ne." When Tind bhshed s anslaon, h was aim conde in 1546. en Luer pubhshed the Scptes in e an e, P L X. publhed a bull  , couch e and opprobrious a. Ar e Reformation e Cch m (not or mskfi of e Scripes to mem ages,  ph om, b wa med  not. Y ts w ewed mus eent; d it w ought b not m ve �e ple, except where there w dger of e receing the nt venice. The Rhsh 1 aw ths  e move  tmdeekln. We a ve mple profs t they a afrd  t e ple ey  the Scps. When the Btish Bible Society pwf- d  bh e y Bible, ut ne or comment, for the  the m Choca, e Engh Rom Caoc cler wod not w it. en e pwion w  me to them, Mr. ndol- phy, a pri of Ldon, d, "If y of the Bible ciees feel    o tm for e Bible by psen us me copies a Caoc vetoion,  or  , we will ay cept ly sb them." Yet when the Bible Society  aut blish e y Bible, e Rom Cathoc cle f ik d Mr. dolphy 8dd, "e Englh Catholic B d t w innd to e l even ek o stereo eon for ey cod not go at  dire ns w receive Testament, They leed d taught r mn by m of ccm d ele- moRtsty tracts." Thus they are against the Bible, because the are eonsciotm the Bible is against them. It is true, they frequontty speak with glatt reverence of the Bible as it is locked up from the people in I. miin; but when it appear in the vulgar language of any comatry,, ami wlmm it

�