Page:Delineation of Roman Catholicism.djvu/20

 Exninatien of tim Scripture texts brought for their support 105 Tmiitiom of the CorindSam "They tl henr you, henr me" &c. 100 Ronm xvi, 17 101 Jo  12 101 .  mt    101 4. Pat ttis ex 101,1 5. tion of the 1 b hmg  of , cm- 102, 103 IV.  t   109 1. e pt   them 103 2. ! t, in  nature,     cble,  ot  a role  f 101 . Some om, cl  be 4. P " --h er, l and to Scripture 105, 106 5. Some traditions are become oboe- leto 106 6. The Church of Rome has invented many new one8 106 7. In point of' cleame, they present mere difflcultin than Scripture 106, 107 8. They are attended with pemiciotm effects 107 9. They o very discordant in their sentiment] respecting tradition 107 (l.) Some make them �al to (.) Others say they re inferior to Scriptur 108' (S.) Others nmke thzm superior to Scripture 105 (4.) Dicerdent sentiments en tradition entertained by the dvine of Trent 108, 109 V. W/tker, a Protesttmt otker ! 110 1. Scripture doee not depend on tra- dition 110, 111 2. Nor the baptism of infants 111 & Nor the observsnce of the Chris- 4. No the procession of the Holy S ' 't 111 5. or of bleed 6. Nor the divinity of Christ 11 VI. Of flair witte traditio 112] VII. 7'uaouy of fA uef fAo.f 112 I. Pre_'hmin tenrob Chartcter of the fathers 118[ _Jeight of their tzstimony 113] Nm of the ft traditiom 11 ll$J Cypri 4. F,r, of tte fom, t! c,'Atry Pap 114 l!4 114 114-116 116-118 118, 110 119, 1) 10 10 Hippolitus l) 121 Eusebiue Pml)hiliue 121 Athenasire 121 AmbM 121 Hfi 121  Nn 121, f Jeem Cm 1 eop ex J . A 1127  ?f exa 127 6. F, of  S 127 John  IBIPALLIBILITY 18 I. 8eme of er ue 18 Roman Catechism quoted 18 Cuncil of Florence 18, It is their great bot n. 1. CoMiders?on of the text] brousht to support it 190 (1.) Matt. xvi, 18, comidered (2.) Matt. xvi, 17 (8.) Matt. xxviii, 20 1Be, 188 (4.) John xiv, 15, 16 188, 134 (5.) The infallibility profsesed by the apostles, confined to their own umes 134, 185 (60 I Thn. 'di, 15 185, 136 (1.) This rsnn. ent would snake men the ptclgse of wtmt God ought to do 197 (2.) h would suppome that di men ,ire infallible 197 (S.) The Jewish Church had no such guide 137 (4.) According tothi ument, �in must not have existed let (5.) It would suppose that an in fallible judge mu el:bt in temporal end civil nmttem 137 (6.) Sh (7.). Norcmdd he end courtover-

�