Page:Current Strategies for Engineering Controls in Nanomaterial Production and Downstream Handling Processes.pdf/40

 In addition to routinely monitoring the hood static pressure, additional system checks should be completed periodically to ensure adequate system performance, including smoke tube testing, hood slot/face velocity measurements, and duct velocity measurements using an anemometer. A dry ice test is another method of evaluation designed to qualitatively determine the containment performance of fume hoods. These system evaluation tasks should become part of a routine preventative maintenance schedule to check system performance. It is important to note that the collection and release of air contaminants may be regulated; companies should contact agencies responsible for local air pollution control to ensure compliance with emissions requirements when implementing new or revised engineering controls. To reduce the risk of exposure to nanomaterials, a few standard precautions should be followed in areas where exposures may occur:


 * Isolate rooms where nanomaterials are handled from the rest of the plant with walls, doors, or other barriers.


 * Maintain production areas where nanomaterials are being produced or handled under negative air pressure relative to the rest of the plant.


 * Install hood static pressure gauges (manometers) near hoods to provide a way to verify proper hood performance.


 * When possible, place hoods away from doors, windows, air supply registers, and aisles to reduce the impact of cross drafts.


 * Provide supply air to production rooms to replace most of the exhausted air.


 * Direct exhaust air discharge stacks away from air intakes, doors, and windows. Consider environmental conditions, especially prevailing winds.

In a review of exposure assessments conducted at nanotechnology plants and laboratories, Brouwer [2010] determined that activities that resulted in exposures included harvesting (e.g., scraping materials out of reactors), bagging, packaging, and reactor cleaning. Downstream activities that may release nanomaterials include bag dumping, manual transfer between processes, mixing or compounding, powder sifting, and machining of parts that contain nanomaterials. Particle concentrations during production activities ranged from about 103–105 particles/cm3. Most studies showed bimodal particle distributions with modes of about 200–400 nm and 1,000–20,000 nm, indicating that the emissions are dominated by aggregates and agglomerates. With the exception of leakage from reactors when primary manufactured nanoparticles may be released, workers are believed to be primarily exposed to agglomerates and aggregates.

Methner et al. [2010] summarized the findings of exposure assessments conducted in 12 facilities with a variety of operations: seven were R&D labs, one produced CNTs, one produced nanoscale TiO2, one produced nanoscale metals and metal oxides, one produced silica-iron nanomaterials, and one manufactured nylon nanofibers. The most common processes observed at these facilities were weighing, mixing, collecting product, manual transfer of product, cleaning operations, drying, spraying, chopping, and sonicating. Current Strategies for Engineering Controls in Nanomaterial Production and Downstream Handling Processes

25