Page:Counterman v. Colorado.pdf/3

Rh political advocacy a hair’s-breadth away from incitement—is not present here. For true threats, recklessness strikes the right balance, offering “enough ‘breathing space’ for protected speech,” without sacrificing too many of the benefits of enforcing laws against true threats. Elonis, 575 U. S., at 748. Pp. 10–14.

, delivered of the Court, in which, and , , and , joined. , filed concurring in part and concurring in the judgment, in which, joined as to Parts I, II, III–A, and III–B. , filed. , filed, in which , joined.