Page:Compiled Laws of the State of North Dakota 1913 vol II.pdf/62

== CODE CIVIL PROCEDURE ==

Civil Actions § 7949
1. The title of the cause, specifying the name of the court in which the section is brough, the name of the county in which the plaintiff desires the trial to be had and the name of the parties to the action, plaintiff and defendant.

2. A plaint and concise statement of the facts constituting a cause of action without unnecessary repetition.

3. A demand of the relief to which the plaintiff supposes himself entitle. If the recovery of money is demanded, the amount thereof shall be stated.

[R.C. 1905, § 6852; C. Civ. P. 1877, §§ 110, 111; R.C. 1899, § 5366.]

Complaint against partners. ''First Nat. Bank v. Hattenbach, 13 S.D. 365, 83 N.W. 421; Van Brunt v. Harrigans'', 8 S.D. 96, 65 N.W. 421.

Exhibit no part of pleading. Aultman & Co v. Siglinger, 2 S.D. 442, 50 N.W. 911; Rust-Owen Lumber Co. v. Fitch, 3 S.D. 213, 52 N.W. 879. Rulling was reversed in ''First Nat. Bank. v. Insurance Co.'', 6 S.D. 424, 61 N.W. 439.

On right to plead allegation of legal conclusion instead of facts upon which it is based. Weber v. Lewis, 19 N.D. 473, 34 L.R.A. (N.S.) 364, 126 N.W. 105.

Pleading in action by wrongfully discharged servant for damages from breach of contract. 6 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1122

-In actions against township for defects in highway. 13 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1243.

-In action against carrier for willful tort of servant to passenger. 40 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1085.

-In private action for violation of statute not expressly conferring right of action. 9 L.R.A. (N.S.) 390.

-In private action for violation of police ordinance affecting operation of railroads. 5 L.R.A. (N.S.) 390.

Complaint against indorser of note. 18 L.R.A. (N.S.) 563.

Sufficiency of general allegations of negligence. 59 L.R.A. 210.

Recovery for ordinary negligence under allegation of gross, willful or wanton negligence of vice versa. 69 L.R.A. 601.

Sufficiency of averments of negligence of carrier causing injury to passenger. 13 L.R.A. (N.S.) 602; 29 L.R.A. (N.S.) 809.

Necessity of alleging negligence in mode of keeping animal known to be dangerous 2 B. R. C. 21.

Necessity as to alleging freedom from contributory negligence. 33 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1152, 1201.

Pleading particular cause of injury as waiver particular cause of injury as waiver of right to rely on res ipas loquitur. 24 L.R.A. (N.S.) 788.

Effect of specification of particular bodily injuries comprehended within general allegation to exclude otherwise comprehended within general allegation. 27 L.R.A. (N.S.) 837.

Alleging in single count two or more acts of negligence capable of contributing to injury. 27 L.R.A. (N.S.) 792.

Requisites of averment in complaint as to causal connection between violation of law or ordinance by a railroad company injury. 8 L.R.A. (N.S.) 987.

Necessity in complaint for specific performance of alleging adequacy of consideration for contract sought to be enforced. 19 L.R.A. (N.S.) 178.

Necessary allegations in action for account between cotenants. 28 L.R.A. 850.

Necessity of alleging jurisdictional residence in divorce proceedings. 12 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1197.

Necessity of averring seduction in order to recover therefor in an action for breach of promise. 33 L.R.A. (N.S.) 702.

As to similar provisions in Cal. Code Civ. Proc., § 426, see Devoe v. Devoe, 51 Cal. 543; Wilson v. Smith, 61 Cal. 209; Thomas v. Deamond, 63 Cal. 426; Hurlbutt v. Spaulding S. Co., 93 Cal. 55, 28 Pac. 795; Johnson v. Polhemus, 99 Cal. 240, 33 Pac. 908; Blumberg v. Birch, 99 Cal. 416, 37 Am. St. Rep. 67, 34 Pac. 102; Callahan v. Broderick, 124 Cal. 80, 56 Pac. 782; Brown v. Martin, 25 Cal. 82; Joseph v. Holt, 37 Cal. 250; Nevada Co. & S. C. Co. v. Kidd, 37 Cal. 282.

2. Complaint must allege all facts necessary to be proven. Busta v. Wardall 3 S.D. 141, 52 N.W. 418; Sherman v. Engine Co., 8 S.D. 343, 66 N.W. 1077; Iowa & Dakota Co. v. Schamber, 15 S.D. 588, 91 N.W. 78; Clay County v. Simonson, 2 D. 112, 2 N.W. 260.

Complaint in action to recover damages caused by fire alleged to have been negligently allowed by defendant to spread to plaintiff's land need not describe land to which fire spread. Seckerson v. Sinclair, 24 N.D. 625, 140 N.W. 239.

Sufficiency of allegation of facts in regard to defect in street or highway in action against municipal corporation for injuries received therefrom. 21 L.R.A. (N.S.) 42.