Page:Compiled Laws of the State of North Dakota 1913 vol II.pdf/55

== CODE CIVIL PROCEDURE ==

Commencing §§ 7426-7427
Embraces foreign as well as domestic corporations. ''Christernson v. Hendrie & B. Mfg. & Supply Co.'', 26 S.D. 519, 128 N.W. 603.

Personal service had on treasurer of domestic corporation in, and who resides in another state, gives sufficient notice of pendency of action, and confers jurisdiction over corporation. ''Straub v. Lyman Land & Invest. Co.'', 30 S.D. 310, 46 L.R.A. (N.S.) 941, 138 N.W. 957.

What constitutes "personal service" of papers. 16 L.R.A. 200.

Personal service of process out of state on nonresident. 50 L.R.A. 585.

Necessity for service upon wife in action for wife's libel and slander. 30 L.R.A. 529.

Service of process on prisoner. 46 L.R.A. 706

Constructive or substituted service on resident in action in personam as due process of law. 35 L.R.A. (N.S.) 292.

Character of inquiry as to whereabouts of party necessary to sustain constructive service of process. 37 L.R.A. (N.S.) 206

Where may process be served under statutes providing for constructive service by leaving it at one's usual place of abode, residence and the like 21 L.R.A. (N.S.) 344.

Acquiring jurisdiction over foreign corporation by service of process. 70 L.R.A. 532.

Soliciting trade as doing business within the state so as to authorize service against foreign corporation. 9 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1214; 23 L.R.A. (N.S.) 834.

Service of process on state officer for foreign corporation. 23 L.R.A. 499.

Service of process on insurance commissioner for foreign company. 23 L.R.A. 499.

Revocation by foreign corporation of appointment of attorney or agent to receive service of process. 30 L.R.A. (N.S.) 678.

What service of process upon foreign corporation is sufficient to constitute due process of law. 50 L.R.A. 589.

Service of process upon foreign corporation not doing business within the state, as basis of a judgment in personam. 8 L.R.A. (N.S.) 538.

Who may be served with process in suit against foreign a foreign corporation. 23 L.R.A. 490.

Right to serve process in an action against corporation upon nonresident officer who is within state as a party or witness. 24 L.R.A. (N.S.) 276.

Who is managing agent of foreign corporation for purposes of service of process. 4 L.R.A. (N.S.) 460.

Validity of service upon nonresident officer of foreign corporation while in state in connection with transaction to which the action relates. 43 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1015

As to similar provisions in Cal. Code Civ. Proc., § 411, see Brown v. Lawson, 51 Cal. 615; ''Sacramento Sav. Bank v. Spencer, 53 Cal. 737; Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Superior Court'', 66 Cal. 311, 5 Pac. 490; Justice v. Ott, 87 Cal. 530, 25 Pac. 691; Norton v. Atchison, T. & S.F.R. Co., 97 Cal. 388, 33 Am. St. Rep. 198, 30 Pac. 127 Cal. 67, 59 Pac. 300; Booth v. Gamble-Robinson C. Co., 139 Cal. 175, 72 Pac. 908; Jameson v. Simonds Saw Co., 2 Cal. App. 582, 84 Pac. 289; Adams & Co. v. Town, 3 Cal. 247; Aiken v. Quartz R. M. G. Min. Co., 6 Cal. 186; Gray v. Palmer, 9 Cal. 616; O'Brien v. Shaw's Flat & T.C. Co., 10 Cal. 343; Edmonson v. Mason 16 Cal. 387; Kennedy v. Hibernia S. & L. Soc., 38 Cal. 151; Eel River N. Co. v. Struver, 41 Cal. 616.

As to similar provision in N.Y. Code Civ. Proc., § 432, see Grant v. Cananea Consolidated Copper Co., 189 N.Y. 241, 82 N.E. 191; Palmer v. Chicago Evening Post Co., 85 Hun, 403, 32 N.Y. Supp. 992; Coler v. Pittsburgh Bridge Co., 146 N.Y. 281, 40 N.E. 779; Vitolo v. Bee Pub Co., 66 App. Div. 582, 73 N.Y. Supp. 273.

§ 7427. By whom summons served. The summons may be served by the sheriff of the county where the defendant may be found, or by any other person not a party to the action. The service shall be made and the summons returned with proof of the service to the person whose name is subscribed thereto with all reasonable diligence. The person subscribing the summons thereof, and the service shall then be made accordingly; provided, however, that whenever any summons or other process shall be served by any person therefor, either for mileage in traveling or making such service, or for serving said summons or process.

[R.C. 1905, § 6839; C. Civ. P. 1877, § 103; 1883, Sp. Ch. 35, § 1; 1885, ch. 138, § 1; R.C. 1899, § 5253.]

Summons cannot be served by a minor. Gilson v. Kuenert 15 S.D. 291, 89 N.W. 472.

Must be served with seasonable diligence. Brettell v. Deffebach, 6 S.D. 21, 60 N.W. 167.

Service of summons by agent of plaintiff valid. ''Plano Mfg. Co. v. Murphy'', 16 S.D. 380, 92 N.W. 1072.

As to similar provision in Cal. Code Civ. Proc., § 410, see Maynard v. MacCrellish, 57 Cal. 355; Pellier v. Gillespie, 67 Cal. 582, 8 Pac. 185; Anderson v. Goff, 72 Cal. 65,