Page:Competition Ordinance (Cap. 619).pdf/57

Rh

:(b) no injustice would be caused as a result of the extension.

(3) Despite subsection (2), an application for a review of a reviewable determination may not be made more than 3 years after the day on which the determination was made.

89. Stay of execution of reviewable determination

(1) The making of an application for review does not by itself operate as a stay of execution of the determination to which the application relates.

(2) A person or undertaking that has made an application for review may, at any time before the application is determined by the Tribunal, apply to the Tribunal for a stay of execution of the determination to which the application relates.

(3) When an application is made under subsection (2), the Tribunal must, as soon as reasonably practicable, conduct a hearing to determine the application, and may, where it considers it appropriate, order a stay of execution of the determination to which the application relates.

(4) An order for a stay of execution under this section may be made subject to such conditions as to costs, payment of money into the Tribunal or otherwise as the Tribunal considers appropriate.   PART 6 Division 1—Introductory 90. Interpretation

In this Part—

“disqualification order” (取消資格令) means an order made by the Tribunal under section 101 disqualifying a person from being a director of a company or from otherwise being concerned in the affairs of a company;

“pecuniary penalty” (罰款) means a pecuniary penalty ordered to be paid, under section 93.

91. Persons involved in contravention of competition rule

A reference in this Part to a person being involved in a contravention of a competition rule means a person who—