Page:Comey-Interview-12-7-18-Redacted.pdf/122

122 in the public. If there is something that he can look at, because, as you know, part of that -- parts of that application is classified.

Mr. I was told that -- that the Director didn't want to review any classified information today and that he came here without any provisional clearances because he didn't want them, but yet he was prepared to answer any questions that may pertain to classified information. Is that incorrect?

Mr. That is incorrect. We were told in advance that this would not deal with anything law enforcement sensitive or classified information.

Mr. Who told you that?

Mr. House counsel. Not so much who told me, so much as a representation made before a United States district judge.

Mr. So, Mr. Chairman, I would recommend that there are two different statements that the attorney just made. One was classified; the other was law enforcement sensitive. I can't imagine that House counsel would have inadvertently agreed to that. We need to check with Mr. Hungar and make sure that we're consistent with that.

Chairman We'll do that. The House counsel's position is very clear, that the Congress does not recognize an ongoing investigation prohibition on answering questions. We do obviously recognize a classified, and we're prepared to create