Page:Comedies of Aristophanes (Hickie 1853) vol2.djvu/371

Rh been translated, "Philocrates of the poultry-market." See Bernhardy, W. S. p. 228, and note on Lys. 557.

, 293. "Zweideutig Aristophanes Av. 293,, mit Büschen." Bernhardy.

, 652. The view of the construction taken in the note is remarkably confirmed by the following passage: Xenoph. Cyrop. ii. 1, 5, . The accusative in both of these passages is an example of Accusativus de quo; for which, see note on Plut. 33.

, 1406. The translation given in the text is undoubtedly the only correct one. See Bernhardy, W. S. p. 332.

. 391. The examples cited in the note are nihil ad rem. The position of the article shows that is attributive (=the rascally Demostratus,) and cannot be taken as an imprecation. See Bernhardy, W. S. p. 81, and p. 95.

. 394, . See Bernhardy, W. S. p. 323.

. 207, . This ought to have been translated, "frog-swans," after the analogy of the constructions given in the note on Aves, 1154. Cf Krüger, Gr. Gr. §57, 1, obs. 1. So Aves, 1059,, a camel-lamb. Ibid. 169,, a man-bird. See Bernhardy, W. S. p. 50.

. 251. Mr. Mitchell's interpretation is the only correct one. See Bernhardy, W. S. p. 256.