Page:Colorado State Constitution (2020).pdf/47

 In the 1962 election "Amendment No. 8" was rejected and "Amendment No. 7", amending sections 45, 46, 47 and 48 of article V of the constitution was approved. The question before the court under this case was whether apportionment of the senate under "Amendment No. 7" was valid. The court held the apportionment comported with the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution and dismissed the case.

This decision was appealed in '''Lucas v. Forty-fourth Gen. Ass'y, 377 U.S. 713, 84 S. Ct. 1459, 13 L. Ed. 2d 632 (1964),''' wherein the U.S. supreme court reversed the district court and held such apportionment did not comport to the equal protection clause and remanded the case for further proceedings.

'''Further proceedings were had in the case of Lucas v. Forty-fourth Gen. Ass'y, 232 F. Supp. 797 (D. Colo. 1964).''' At this hearing the district court held that "Amendment No. 7" was not severable and therefore failed in toto and subdistricting was not prohibited by section 47 of article V. Furthermore, the imminence of the 1964 election did not require utilization of the apportionment provisions of the invalid "Amendment No. 7" as there was sufficient time for the state to take action to effectuate the U.S. supreme court decision. The matter was set over pending such state action.

Following this hearing the Governor called a special session and as a result an apportionment bill (Senate Bill No. 1, L. 64, 2nd Ex. Sess., pp. 27-37) was enacted. This Senate Bill No. 1 was submitted to the district court which approved it but retained jurisdiction.

The decision was appealed to the U.S. supreme court in the case of Forty-fourth Gen. Ass'y v. Lucas, 379 U.S. 693, 85 S. Ct. 715, 13 L. Ed. 2d 699 (1964). The supreme court affirmed all decisions of the federal court relating to federal questions but vacated the decision as to all other questions and remanded the case, leaving open to the district court the question of severability of "Amendment No. 7".

Before the decision on this appeal was handed down there was a supervening case in the state court, White v. Anderson, 155 Colo. 291, 394 P.2d 333 (1964), wherein the constitutionality of that portion of section 47 of article V dealing with subdistricting was questioned. The supreme court held the subdistricting provision was a state question in spite of retained jurisdiction of the federal district court and determined the subdistricting provision was invalid but in view of the imminence of the 1964 election, stayed effect of its judgment until the convening of the 1965 session of the legislature.

The Forty-fifth General Assembly introduced an apportionment bill (House Bill No. 1438, later postponed). During its progress through the House interrogatories were submitted to the state supreme court requesting an opinion on the severability of "Amendment No. 7". The court held in In re Interrogatories, 157 Colo. 76, 400 P.2d 931 (1965), that such amendment was not severable and the whole "Amendment No. 7" was invalid and void.

Section 46.Senatorial and representative districts - commission created. (1) Declaration of the people. The people of the state of Colorado find and declare that: Colorado Revised Statutes 2020