Page:Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje - Mohammedanism (1916).djvu/79

 72 did the orthodox Mohammedan dogma begin to emerge from the clash of opinions into its definite shape. The Muʿtazilites had advocated man's free will; had given prominence to justice and holiness in their conception of God, had denied distinct qualities in God and the eternity of God's Word; had accepted a place for the neutral between Paradise and Hell; and for some time the favour of the powers in authority seemed to assure the victory of their system. Al-Ashʿarî contradicted all these points, and his system has in the end been adopted by the great majority. The Muʿtazilite doctrines for a long time still enthralled many minds, but they ended by taking refuge in the political heresy of Shîʿitism. In the most conservative circles, opponents to all speculation were never wanting; but they were obliged unconsciously to make large concessions to systematic thought; for in the Moslim world as elsewhere religious belief without dogma had become as impossible as breathing is without air.

Thus, in Islâm, a whole system, which could not even pretend to draw its authority from the Sunnah, had come to be accepted. It was not difficult to justify this deviation from the orthodox abhorrence against novelties. Islâm has always looked at the world in a pessimistic way, a view expressed in numberless prophetic sayings. The world is bad and will become worse and worse. Religion and morality will have to wage an ever more hopeless war against unbelief,