Page:Casino Control Act 2006.pdf/123

Rh :(b) in any other proceedings, the court is of the opinion that justice cannot be fully done between the parties thereto without the disclosure of the name of an informer, the court may permit inquiry and require full disclosure concerning the informer.

Evidence

188.—(1) In proceedings under this Act, an assertion—
 * (a) that, at a specified time or during a specified period, a specified person was the Minister administering any Act;
 * (b) that, at a specified time or during a specified period, a specified person held, or is acting in, a specified office;
 * (c) that a signature purporting to be the signature of a Minister, an inspector, a police officer or an authorised person is the signature it purports to be;
 * (d) that, at a specified time or during a specified period, a specified person was, or was not, the holder of a specified licence, permit, approval or other authorisation under this Act; or
 * (e) that, at a specified time, a person attained a specified age or that, at a specified time or during a specified period, a specified person was below or above a specified age,

is evidence of the fact or facts asserted.

(2) In proceedings under this Act—
 * (a) a document purporting to be a copy of a direction, notice, order, requirement or decision given or made under this Act is evidence of a direction, notice, order, requirement or decision of which it purports to be a copy;
 * (b) a document purporting to be a copy of a licence, permit, approval or other authorisation under this Act is evidence of the licence, permit, approval or authorisation of which it purports to be a copy; and
 * (c) evidence that a person accepted service of a document is evidence of the authority of the person to accept service of the document.