Page:Burwell v Hobby Lobby.pdf/95

Rh

13–354

13–356

and, dissenting.

We agree with that the plaintiffs' challenge to the contraceptive coverage requirement fails on the merits. We need not and do not decide whether either for-profit corporations or their owners may bring claims under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. Accordingly, we join all but Part III–C–1 of dissenting opinion.