Page:Appletons' Cyclopædia of American Biography (1900, volume 2).djvu/772

736 his life. He continued the acquaintance by correspondence, became engaged, married her in North Carolina, and made a short wedding-journey, of which his first visit to Washington was the principal feature. About the same period he contributed a good many verses to the &ldquo;Log Cabin&rdquo; &mdash; &ldquo;Historic Pencillings,&rdquo; &ldquo;Nero's Tomb,&rdquo; &ldquo;Fantasies,&rdquo; &ldquo;On the Death of William Wirt,&rdquo; etc. They are not destitute of poetic feeling, but in later years he was never glad to have them recalled. In 1859, learning that Robert Bonner, of the &ldquo;New York Ledger,&rdquo; proposed to include them among representative poems in a volume to be made up from authors not appearing in Charles A. Dana's &ldquo;Household Book of Poetry,&rdquo; Mr. Greeley wrote: &ldquo;Mr. Bonner, be good enough &mdash; you must &mdash; to exclude me from your new poetic Pantheon. I have no business therein, no right and no desire to be installed there. I am no poet, never was (in expression), and never shall be. True, I wrote some verses in my callow days, as I suppose most persons who can make intelligible pen-marks have done; but I was never a poet, even in the mists of deluding fancy. . . . Within the last ten years I have been accused of all possible and some impossible offences against good taste, good morals, and the common weal; I have been branded aristocrat, communist, infidel, hypocrite, demagogue, disunionist, traitor, corruptionist, and so forth, and so forth, but cannot remember that any one has flung in my face my youthful transgressions in the way of rhyme. . . . Let the dead rest! and let me enjoy the reputation, which I covet and deserve, of knowing poetry from prose, which the ruthless resurrection of my verses would subvert, since the unobserving majority would blindly infer that I considered them poetry.&rdquo;

In establishing the &ldquo;Tribune,&rdquo; Mr. Greeley had considerable reputation, wide acquaintance among newspaper men and practical politicians, one thousand dollars in money borrowed from James Coggeshall, and the promise from another source of a thousand more, which was never realized. He had employed, some time before, at $8 a week, a young man fresh from the University of Vermont. This young man, Henry J. Raymond, now became his chief assistant in the conduct of the new paper, and gradually a considerable force of people of similar fitness gathered about him, the paper always having an attraction for men of intellect and scholarly tastes. In the early years it thus enjoyed the services of George William Curtis, William Henry Fry, Charles A. Dana, Margaret Fuller, Albert Brisbane, Bayard Taylor, Count Gurowski, and others. Of its first number, 5,000 copies were printed, and, as Mr. Greeley said, &ldquo;with difficulty given away.&rdquo; About 600 subscribers had been procured through the exertions of his personal and political friends. Being published at first at one cent a copy, it was regarded as a serious rival by the cheap papers, and the &ldquo;Sun&rdquo; especially undertook to interfere with its circulation by forbidding its newsboys to sell the new paper. The public considered this unfair, and the &ldquo;Tribune&rdquo; was greatly helped. In four weeks it reached a circulation of 6,000; in four weeks more its circulation had risen to the limit of the press, being between 11,000 and 12,000. Its business management was chaotic, but by July the chances for a permanent success were so clear that Thomas McElrath, a business man of excellent standing, was taken in as an equal partner. A weekly issue was projected, and on 20 Sept. the &ldquo;New Yorker&rdquo; and the &ldquo;Log Cabin&rdquo; were merged in the first number of &ldquo;The New York Weekly Tribune,&rdquo;

which soon attained considerable circulation and ultimately became a great political and social force in rural communities, particularly in the period of the anti-slavery discussion prior to and during the war for the Union. From this time forward Mr. Greeley's business prosperity was secure, but the &ldquo;Tribune&rdquo; might easily have been far more successful from the mere money point of view if its editor had been less outspoken and indifferent to the light in which the New York public might regard his opinions. The controlling influences in the city were then largely favorable to free-trade; but he made the &ldquo;Tribune&rdquo;\ aggressively protectionist. A commercial community was necessarily conservative, but the &ldquo;Tribune&rdquo; soon came to be everywhere regarded as radical. New York had close business connections with the south, but the &ldquo;Tribune&rdquo; gradually became more and more explicit in its anti-slavery utterances. The prevailing religious faith among the better educated classes was orthodox; Mr. Greeley connected himself almost from the outset with a Universalist church. He aimed always to practise the utmost hospitality toward new ideas and their exponents, so that people soon talked of the &ldquo;isms&rdquo; of the &ldquo;Tribune.&rdquo; Sympathizing profoundly with workingmen, he was led constantly to schemes for bettering their condition, and became interested in the theories of Fourier. Before the &ldquo;Tribune&rdquo; was a year old he had discussed the subject of &ldquo;Fourierism in France&rdquo; in an article beginning thus: &ldquo;We have written something, and shall yet write much more, in illustration and advocacy of the great social revolution which our age is destined to commence, in rendering all useful labor at once attractive and honorable, and banishing want and all consequent degradation from the globe. The germ of this revolution is developed in the writings of Charles Fourier.&rdquo; In March, 1842, he began publishing, under a contract with a number of New York Fourierites, one column daily on the first page of the &ldquo;Tribune&rdquo; on Fourierite topics, from the pen of Albert Brisbane. The theories here advanced were also occasionally defended in the editorial columns. Mr. Greeley became a subscriber to one or two Fourierite associations, notably that of the &ldquo;American Phalanx&rdquo; at Red Bank, N. J., and occasionally addressed public meetings on the subject. When the famous Brook Farm experiment was abandoned, its chief, George Ripley, sought employment on the &ldquo;Tribune,&rdquo; and was soon its literary editor. Another of its members, Charles A. Dana, became in time the &ldquo;Tribune's&rdquo; managing editor. Another, Margaret Fuller, contributed literary work and occasional editorials, and lived in Mr. Greeley's family; and another, George William Curtis, was also employed. In 1846 Henry J. Raymond, who had now, owing to some disagreement, left the &ldquo;Tribune&rdquo; and become a leading editor on the &ldquo;Courier and Enquirer,&rdquo; saw that Fourierism offered an inviting point for attack upon the &ldquo;Tribune.&rdquo; Mr. Greeley, whose conduct of the paper was always argumentative and pugnacious, responded to some criticism by challenging Mr. Raymond to a thorough discussion of the whole subject, in a series of twelve articles and replies, to be published in full in all the editions of each paper. Mr. Raymond accepted, and made therein his first wide reputation in New York. Mr. Greeley's articles were undoubtedly able, but he was not so adroit a fencer as his opponent, and he had the unpopular side. The discussion left on the public mind the impression that Mr. Raymond was the victor, and the Fourierite movement from that date began its