Page:Ante-Nicene Fathers volume 1.djvu/67



HE first certain reference which is made by any early writer to this so-called Epistle of Clement is found in these words of Eusebius (Hist. Eccl. iii. 38): "We must know that there is also a second Epistle of Clement. But we do not regard it as being equally notable with the former, since we know of none of the ancients that have made use of it." Several critics in modern times have endeavoured to vindicate the authenticity of this epistle. But it is now generally regarded as one of the many writings which have been falsely ascribed to Clement. Besides the want of external evidence, indicated even by Eusebius in the above extract, the diversity of style clearly points to a different writer from that of the first epistle. A commonly accepted opinion among critics at the present day is, that this is not an epistle at all, but a fragment of one of the many homilies falsely ascribed to Clement. There can be no doubt, however, that in the catalogue of writings contained in the Alexandrian. it is both styled an epistle, and, as well as the other which accompanies it, is attributed to Clement. As the. is certainly not later than the fifth century, the opinion referred to must by that time have taken firm root in the church; but in the face of internal evidence, and in want of all earlier testimony, such a fact goes but a small way to establish its authenticity.