Page:American Journal of Sociology Volume 5.djvu/260



No Satisfactory theory of the origin of modesty has been advanced. The naive assumption that men were ashamed because they were naked, and clothed themselves to hide their nakedness, is not tenable in face of the large mass of evidence that many of the natural races are naked, and not ashamed of their nakedness; and a much stronger case can be made out for the contrary view, that clothing was first worn as a mode of attraction, and modesty then attached to the act of removing the clothing; but this view in turn does not explain an equally large number of cases of modesty among races which wear no clothing at all. A third theory of modesty, the disgust theory, stated by Professor James and developed somewhat by Havelock Ellis, makes modesty the outgrowth of our disapproval of immodesty in others — " the application in the second instance to ourselves of judgments primarily passed upon our mates." The sight of offensive behavior is no doubt a powerful deterrent from like behavior, but this seems to be a secondary manifestation in the case of modesty ; and I hope presently to show that the genesis of modesty is to be found in the activity in the midst of which it appears, and not in the inhibition of activity like the activity of others ; and that it has primarily no connection with clothing whatever.

Professor Angell and Miss Thompson have made an investigation of the relation of circulation and respiration to attention,