Page:Alan Turing - Proposed Electronic Calculator (1945).pdf/46

 In order to give an idea of the effect of these delays we have shown in Fig. 45 a pulse of width 0.2 μs and the same pulse delayed, after the manner of Fig. 44a, by 0.03 μs, this representing our calculated value of 0.003 multiplied by 10 to allow for numerous grids, etc. etc. It will be seen that the effect is by no means to be ignored, but nevertheless of a controllable magnitude.

(iii) Use of cathode followers.- In order to try and separate stages from one another as far as possible we shall make considerable use of cathode followers. This is a form of circuit which gives no amplification, and indeed a small attenuation (e.g. 0.5 dB); but has a very large input impedance and a very low output impedance. This means chiefly that we can load a valve with many connections into cathode followers without its output being seriously affected.

Fig. 46 shows a design of cathode follower in which the input capacity effect has been reduced by arranging that the anode is screened from the grid and that the screen voltage as well as that of the cathode moves with the grid. If one could ignore transit time effects this would have virtually zero input capacity.

(iv) The ‘limiting amplifier’ circuit.- When low frequencies are used the limiter circuit can conveniently be nothing more nor less than an amplifier, the limiting effect appearing at cut-off and when grid and cathode voltages are equal. At high frequencies we cannot get a very effective limiting effect at cathode voltage, owing to the fact that the grid must be supplied from a comparatively low impedance source to avoid a large delay arising from input capacity, but on the other hand, in order to get a limiting effect we need a high impedance, high compared with the grid conduction impedance (about 2000 ohms probably). At high frequencies it is probably better to use a ‘Kipp relay’ circuit. This is nothing more than a multivibrator in which one leg has been made infinitely long (and then some), i.e. one of the two semi-stable states has been made really stable. An impulse will however make the system occupy the other state for a time and then return, producing a pulse during the period in which it occupies the less stable state. This pulse can be taken in either polarity. It is fairly square in shape and its amplitude is sensibly independent of the amplitude of the tripping pulse, although its time may depend on it slightly. These are all definite advantages.

A suggested circuit is shown in Fig. 47, and the waveforms associated with it at various points in Fig. 48.

(v) Trigger circuit.- The trigger circuit need only differ very little from the limiter or Kipp relay. It needs to have two quite stable states, and we therefore return both of the grids of the 6SN7 to -15 volts instead of returning one to ground. Secondly the inhibitory connection is different. In the case of the limiter it simply consists of an opposing or negative voltage on the cathode follower; in the case of the trigger circuit it must trip the valve back, and therefore we need a second cathode follower input connected to the other grid of the 6SN7.

(vi) Unit delay.- The essential part of the unit delay is a network, designed to work out of a low impedance and into a high one. The response at the output to a pulse at the input should preferably be of the form indicated in Fig. 50, i.e. there should be a maximum response at time 1 μs after the initiating pulse, and the response should be zero by a time 2 μs after it, and should remain there. It is particularly important that the response should be near to zero at the integral multiples of 1 μs after the initiating pulse (other than 1 μs after it). A/