Page:Adams ex rel. Kasper v. School Board of St. Johns County, Florida (2018).pdf/45

 bathrooms, especially when he has to walk right past an available boys’ restroom to find one. Doc. 160-1 at Tr. 204 (describing the walk from his class to a gender-neutral single-stall bathroom as “feel[ing] almost like a walk of shame”).

He also testified about the message it sends to other students that the school does not view him as a real boy. Using his words: “[B]ecause I’m using a special bathroom and I’m oftentimes passing a men’s bathroom, everybody knows I’m different, and I just want to fit in. So it’s the opposite of what I want.” at Tr. 205. In, the Third Circuit rejected the suggestion from cisgender students that the school should offer transgender students the opportunity to use gender-neutral single-stall facilities, finding that policy “invite[s] more scrutiny and attention” from the transgender students’ peers, “very publicly brand[ing] all transgender students with a scarlet “T” [which] they should not have to endure … as the price of attending their public school.” 893 F.3d at 192 (quoting , 858 F.3d at 1045). The Court