Page:Adams ex rel. Kasper v. School Board of St. Johns County, Florida (2018).pdf/32

 testified that the school had no problems implementing the policy, which was occasioned by a student who transitioned during the school year. at Tr. 26–27. Aberli explained that this was his first encounter with a transgender student and he had a steep learning curve but ultimately concluded that “being transgender was a real thing that the school would have to respond to.” at Tr. 31. Although many parents initially had concerns about safety and privacy, the school has disciplinary procedures to address any violations, and none have occurred. at Tr. 45–54.

III.Conclusions of Law

To prevail, Adams must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the School Board violated his rights under the Equal Protection Clause and/or Title IX. If Adams does so, it is also his burden to prove (again by a preponderance of the evidence) how this violation caused him damage. Pattern Jury Instructions,