Page:A treatise upon the law of copyright.djvu/39

 Falk v. Brett

�1891

�48 Fed. Rep., 678

�245

�XXXlll

�Falk V. Curtis

�igoi

�107 Fed. Rep., 126

�290, 291

� �,, ,,

�1900

�100 Fed. Rep., 77

�290

� �), ,,

�1900

�98 Fed. Rei)., 989

�290

� �Falk V. Donaldson

�T893

�57 Fed. Rep., 32

�245. 253,

�276, 2S0,

� � � �281, 283

�Falk V. Gast.

�1893

�54 Fed. Rep., 890

�259, 262,

�289

�), ,, • • •

�1891

�48 Fed. Rep., 262

�245. 251,

�259

�Falk V. Heffron

�•893

�56 Fed. Rep., 299

�290

� �Falk V. Howell

�1888

�37 Fed. Rep., 202

�276, 281,

�283

�Falk V. Schumacher

�1891

�48 Fed. Rep., 222

�255. 293

� �Farmer v. Culvert.

�1872

�5 Am. L. T. R., 168

�280, 282

� �Farmer v. Elstner.

�1888

�33 Fed. Rep., 494

�279, 289

� �Fishel V. Lueckel.

�1892

�53 Fed. Rep., 499

�276, 277,

�280, 291

�Folsom V. Marsh.

�1841

�2 Story, TOO

�243, 277, 284

�279, 280,

�French v. Krehng.

�1894

�63 Fed. Rep., 621

�262

� �French v. Maguire.

�1878

�55 How. (N.Y.) Pr.

/I "7 T

�263, 299

� �GiLMORE V. Anderson

�1890

�42 Fed. Rep., 267

�289

� �,, ,,

�1889

�38 Fed. Rep., 846

�274, 278,

�2S3

�Goldmark v. Kreling

�1888

�35 Fed. Rep., 661

�281

� �,, ,,

�1885

�25 Fed. Rep., 349

�299

� �Gottisberg v. Aldine

�1887

�33 Fed. Rep., 381

�261

� �Gould V. Banks

�1832

�8 Wend., 562

�240, 274

� �Gray v. Russell

�>S39

�1 Story, 1 1

�240, 241,

�243. 270,

� � � �278, 279, 284

�Greene v. Bishop.

�1858

�I CHff., 186

�243, 269,

�279

�Harper v. Holman

�• 1897

�84 Fed. Rep., 224

�291, 296

� �Harper v. Shoppell

�1886

�23 Blatchf., 431

�276

� �Hefel V. Whitely.

�1893

�54 Fed. Rep., 179

�256

� �Hegemen v. Springer

�1901

�no Fed. Rep., 374

�290

� �Heine v. Appleton

�1853

�4 Blatchf. C.C, 12

�240, 269,

�271, 272,

�Henderson v. Tompkins

�1894

�60 Fed. Rep., 758

�293

240

� �Higgins V. Keuffel

�1891

�140 U.S. Rep., 428

�246

� �Hill V. Epley

�1858

�31 Penn., 331

�293

� �Hoertel v. Raphael Tuck

�1899

�94 Fed. Rep., 844

�294

� �Holmes v. Donohue

�1896

�77 Fed. Rep., 179

�263

� �Holmes v. Hurst.

�1898

�174 U.S. Rep., 82

�263, 296

� �Howell V. Miller.

�1898

�91 Fed. Rep., 129

�241, 280,

�2S2

�Hubbard v. Thompson

�18S2

�14 Fed. Rep., 68q

�291

� ��Illustrated America?! v.

New York Press Isaacs V. Daly

T-'^CKSON V. Walkie Jewellers' Mercantile

Agency v. Jewellers'

Publishing Co.

��1892 Cited, U.S., 594 256

1875 39 N. Y., 511 244, 245

��1886 29 Fed. Rep., 15 1898 155 N. v., 241

��255

251, 260, 261, 262, 263, 296

�� �